Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids


Androcles wrote:
> "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1128426239.166551.100160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> |
> | Androcles wrote:
> | > "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxx> wrote in message
> | > news:1128330177.421954.210680@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | > | Androcles wrote:
> | > |
> | > | > "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> | > message news:dhm3i2$f75$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | > | > | Androcles wrote:
> | > | > | > I think you have demonstrated that I was right when saying:
> | > | > | > "Having realized that you screwed up, you must find
> | > | > | > something else to talk about."
> | > | > | > How could you screw up such a simple case of elementary
> | > | > | > Roche limit and get it 3,000,000,000% wrong, tusselad?
> | > | > |
> | > | > | I am beginning to suspect that your stupidity is even
> | > | > | greater than I initially could bring myself to believe.
> | > | >
> | > | > I'm sure the opinion of a phuckwit is highly regarded by
> | > | > the other phuckwits, tusselad.
> | > | >
> | > | >
> | > | > | I now think it's so gigantic that you do NOT realize
> | > | > | how thoroughly you screw up when you claimed:
> | > | > | "If the Moon were a fluid
> | > | > | it would break apart like droplets of mercury."
> | > | >
> | > | > I preceeded that with "If", tusselad; how could you screw up
> | > | > such a simple case of elementary logic? Well, in your case how
> | > | > could you not screw it up?
> | > |
> | > |
> | > | I would like to say "nice try".
> | > | But I can't.
> | > | It was an extraordinary stupid attempt to divert
> | > | the attention from the fact that you have still
> | > | not realized that your statement:
> | > | "If the Moon were a fluid
> | > | it would break apart like droplets of mercury."
> | > | is factually wrong.
> | >
> | > The rings of Saturn are factually wrong, are they, tusselad?
> |
> | I would like to say "nice try".
> | But I can't.
> | It was an extraordinary stupid attempt
>
> *** off.
> Androcles

OK, I will do that.

But before doing so, I will sum up what we
have learned.

We have learned that Androcles is so stupid
that he fails to realize that his statement:
"If the Moon were a fluid it would break
apart like droplets of mercury."
is factually wrong.

Androcles' comment:
" I preceeded that with "If", tusselad; how could you
screw up such a simple case of elementary logic?"
have taught us that Androcles is so stupid that he thinks
his statement: "If the Moon were a fluid
it would break apart like droplets of mercury."
is correct just because it starts with an "If".

Androcles' comment:
"The rings of Saturn are factually wrong, are they, tusselad?"
has further taught us that Androcles is so stupid that he
thinks that unless the Moon of the planet Earth would break
apart like droplets of mercury if it were fluid, the rings
of the planet Saturn cannot exist.

Paul, fucked off

.