Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity
- From: shuba <tim.shuba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 20:37:39 -0500
-* crossposts dropped *-
O'Harry wrote:
> > Pentcho Valev wrote:
> > > According to the traditional interpretation, if an observer compares a
> > > clock passing with constant speed with TWO SYNCHRONIZED clocks in his
> > > own inertial system, he sees the passing clock run slower than the two
> > > synchronized clocks. This statement is reduced to: The observer sees
> > > the passing clock run slow.
> > >
> > > Yet, if the observer belongs to a system moving with constant speed in
> > > a closed curve, he sees the clock at rest (which, for this observer, is
> > > a passing clock) run FAST by a factor of gamma, according to Einstein's
> > > 1905 paper.
> on this point Pentcho is right
Really? For sure? So you think that a "system moving with
constant speed in a closed curve" is a well-defined frame?
---Tim Shuba---
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity
- From: harry
- Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity
- Prev by Date: Re: LET'S DISCUSS SPACETIME AND GRAVITATION, BASING ON LOGIC, RATHER THAN EINSTEIN'S ASSUMPTIONS
- Next by Date: Simple Experiment To Prove the Ether
- Previous by thread: "Relativity and Reasonableness Tests"
- Next by thread: Re: The Most Rigid Taboo in Relativity
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
