Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
- From: schoenfeld1@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 9 Oct 2005 11:22:37 -0700
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
> "Daryl McCullough" <stevendaryl3016@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:diba5p0dml@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > schoenfeld1@xxxxxxxxx says...
> >
> > >You need the strong EP to properly describe noninertial
> > >frames in Relativity.
> >
> > No, you don't. You keep repeating this incorrect statement.
> > Gravity is the theory of curved spacetime. If your problem
> > takes place in *flat* spacetime, then you don't need a theory
> > of gravity.
>
> He is still trying to recover from his silly statement at the
> beginning of this thread:
> | "More precisely, SR can handle accelerated objects if
> | and only if the reference frame is inertial."
It's true, trivially true.
> without having to admit that he was wrong on this.
You are an idiot, Dork, an idiot.
> Since he even maintains that
> | "ds^2 = d(ict)^2 + dx^2 + dy^2 + dz^2 is positive-definite",
> why would he change his mind on the strong EP?
So what is the signatute of that metric then?
You are an idiot, Dork, an idiot.
> There's nothing we can do about that.
> Apparently there's even nothing *he* can do about it either ;-)
And no surprise, idiot Dirk still doesn't why it's important to
preserve proper units in noninertial frames.
You are an idiot, Dork, an idiot.
> Dirk Vdm
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
- References:
- Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
- From: schoenfeld1
- Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
- From: Daryl McCullough
- Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
- From: Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
- Prev by Date: Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
- Next by Date: Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
- Previous by thread: Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
- Next by thread: Re: TomTom's stupidity (re: was always TomTom's stupidity)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|