Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior


Androcles wrote:
> "Will Kramer" <willkramer@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:43494da8.1186893921@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | On 9 Oct 2005 "Jerry" <Cephalobus_alienus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> | >Androcles wrote:

> | >> ROFLMAO!
> | >
> | >How does that comment contribute to the discussion?
> |
> | I think it's a sign of cognitive disonance. On some
> | level of his "mind" (at least when he is sober) he
> | surely realizes that all the spectral information
> | conclusively disproves his juvenile ideas, but at
> | this point in his life it is simply not possible
> | for his conscious "mind" to accept that he has
> | squandered so many years in the service of a foolish
> | delusion. Hence he bursts out into laughter whenever
> | he is confronted with the truth. It's the only way
> | his "mind" can respond. He is a very sad case.
>
> You are quickly disposed of.
> Observation:
> http://www.britastro.org/vss/gifc/00918-ck.gif
> Explanation:
> http://www.ebicom.net/~rsf1/sekerin.htm
>
> Squander that, you stooopid ***.
> *plonk*
> Androcles

As I said before, it is necessary for BaT to explain
-all- the data, and not merely be shown capable of
fitting gross features of averaged light curves. Sekerin
fails to address spectral data, interferometric data,
Cepheid evolution, high precision photometric studies
demonstrating period noise, etc.

Jerry

.

Quantcast