Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior

Androcles wrote:
> "Jerry" <Cephalobus_alienus@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1128897300.680406.321390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

> | OK. In your fit to R Drac. Count 7 cycles from the
> | left. I see period noise amounting to approximately
> | 1/8 of a cycle, over the course of one entire cycle,
> | with prominent amplitude noise in the minimum
> | immediately preceding the shifted cycle.
> |
> | Tell me what caused it.
> |
> | Jerry
> Typical troll, aren't you?

How so? Henri asked me to supply some variable
star data that might be difficult for him to explain,
and I replied as requested. It's a pretty major
amount of period noise for him to explain, far
exceeding any reasonable error bars.

> I can't blame you though,
> H does stick his neck out.

Basically, you are admitting that -you- can't
explain the period noise, either.

> http://www.phys.canterbury.ac.nz/research/laser/ring_2000.shtml
> Tell me what causes the Sagnac effect.

George Dishman has demonstrated in this newsgroup
that Sagnac is inconsistent with BaT. So the onus
is on -you- to come up with an alternative theory
for the Sagnac effect that is consistent with
emission theory.

As for me, I'm totally happy with traditional
treatments of the Sagnac effect, such as the one
on mathpages:
http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-07/2-07.htm

Jerry

.