Re: MMX Expected Shft.
- From: "Koobee Wublee" <kublai@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2005 23:23:37 -0700
"Bill Hobba" <rubbish@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:G9D2f.14525$U51.7555@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> In discussing about the MMX is another post I noticed it and similar
> experiments gave expected fringe shifts based on the sun being stationary
> wrt to an aether.
It is a bad post.
> I can not see how such an assumption would be reasonable.
Not if you close your eyes again to achieve yet another ever higher abstract
conclusion.
> The result of the experiment of course was that the earth was to a rather
> good degree of accuracy stationary wrt to any supposed aether - which
> strongly suggests it does not exist.
Your interpretation to MMX is rather shallow and limited.
> But that the sun is stationary wrt to a supposed aether seems just as
> unlikely.
I agree. This re-infroce my comment above.
> Does anyone know the thinking behind assuming the sun was stationary wrt
> to the aether?
I will bet you nobody knows. If one shows up to claim so, you can label
this person as even whackier than you are.
> Thanks
> Bill
Good night, Bill. Keep your eyes closed.
.
- References:
- MMX Expected Shft.
- From: Bill Hobba
- MMX Expected Shft.
- Prev by Date: Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
- Next by Date: Re: The true crackpots
- Previous by thread: Re: MMX Expected Shft.
- Next by thread: Re: MMX Expected Shft.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
