Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.


John Kennaugh wrote:
> The following is faulty logic -
> 'I see X therefore it is X while ballistic theory says that if it is X I
> should see Y. I don't see Y therefore ballistic theory is wrong.
>
> The logic is faulty because a 1:1 relationship has been assumed.
>
> Equally faulty is if one assumes ballistic theory is right:
> 'I see X but it isn't really X it is Z and if we assume it is Z and
> apply BaT corrections we would expect to see X. We do see X therefore
> Bat is correct.'

The issue is a lot simpler than that.

Henri is claiming BaT can cause a parallax measure to be X
when it is Z which is significantly different from X. You are assuming
that BaT can in fact make that prediction. He has not so far
produced an argument showing that the parallax can be Z but
be measured as X. All he does is say over and over that it
does.

- Randy

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson
    ... Henri Wilson wrote: ... >>The ballistic theory will still predict that HD80715 ... So the "thermal velocity" won't mask out the intense flashes ... > The BaT predicts exactly what is observed. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: 1c+1c Closing Velocity...,answer to Henri Wilson
    ... >>the ballistic theory predicts about HD80715. ... the brightness variations of binary stars in circular orbits ... >>We both know that you have looked, Henri. ... > and show that its curve is predictable by the BaT. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
Quantcast