Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
- From: shuba <tim.shuba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 19:14:17 -0500
Juan R. wrote:
> Your profound confusion
Carlip has an impressive publication record, as well as a website
which is helpful for those interested in physics. Your site at
canonicalscience.com, in contrast, is a piece of crap. The site
that you wrote claims all sorts of research in the name of your
poorly-explained paradigm, but no research is to be found on any
of your pages, much less anything that has been peer-reviewed.
Maybe you could go do something useful, like actually writing and
publishing a paper which is of interest to someone in the
scientific community, and THEN get back to physicist-bashing on
usenet.
Frankly, for someone who doesn't seem to grasp the idea that
equations with units where c=1 are not useful for the limit
c->infinity, you have no business accusing anyone else of being
confused. Reread the simple example by Daryl and the helpful
comments and references given by Carlip. That is, in the
unlikely event that the "Center for CANONICAL |SCIENCE)" contains
any members who are interested in learning about science, and is
not, as it seems, the grandiose self-delusion of an immature brat.
---Tim Shuba---
.
- References:
- Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
- From: Juan R.
- Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
- Prev by Date: Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
- Next by Date: Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
- Previous by thread: Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
- Next by thread: Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
