Re: In the Beginning




"Tom Roberts" <tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx> kirjoitti viestissä
news:dj16lk$6jc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Jack wrote:
> > So does this mean that the expansion velocity was above light speed?
>
> No.
>
>
> > Because if the expansion velocity was at or below light speed and the
> > density was high enough to be a black hole, then I can't really accept
the
> > answer that GR doesn't use the black hole mathematics to describe the
big
> > bang.
>
> It doesn't matter what you accept, the math is clear: the big bang is
> not a black hole.
>
> The reason for this is that GR is a theory expressed as a differential
> equation, and the solutions to that equation depend not only on the
> fields (including energy and momentum densities, etc.) but also on
> boundary conditions. For a singularity like the big bang there is no
> boundary, and one must specify the fields in a self-consistent way on a
> suitable Cauchy surface. If you use a surface "near" the big bang
> singularity, you find that the boundary conditions are not at all like
> those of a black hole; neither are the solutions.
>
> IOW: the "big bang" is a feature of the FRW class of manifolds in GR
> used as the basis of cosmological models. None of them is a black hole.
> <shrug>
>
>
> Tom Roberts tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx

Explanations concerning big bang are not science. Not at least If we want
science to obey some rules and logic.

Henry Haapalainen


.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: In the Beginning
    ... Because if the expansion velocity was at or below light speed and the ... density was high enough to be a black hole, then I can't really accept the ... >> I have always wondered why the 'Big Bang' wasn't a black hole. ... > There are many different types of singularities in GR, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: My response to, "Stephen Hawking revamps black hole theory"
    ... I'm not thinking of a universe being created within a black hole. ... hypothesis essentially "normalizes" the Big Bang phenomenon, ... The mass from just a few stars certainly wouldn't be ... > within the barn. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Expansion/Contraction
    ... My theory is that the big bang was the result of hydrogen atom fusion ... And, as noted, you can't bang your way out of a black hole. ... as a real particle. ... when you get back to the big bang you're at the universe's north pole - ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: Big Bang Refuted--Again
    ... if we accept the current iteration of the constantly mutating "Big Bang" ... Black Hole Is Most Distant Ever Found ... The object, called a quasar and given the catchy name CFHQS J2329-0301, ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Of whats become nondisclosure/taboo
    ... perhaps like that black hole sort of passage that sucks in more ways ... amount or seed of antimatter as having been nicely surrounded by those ... those nearly resting photons might become as great as 1e130. ... In order for there to be a "big bang" there HAD to be ...
    (sci.astro.seti)