Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: daniel009@xxxxxxxxx (Daniel Weston)
- Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2005 20:35:54 -0700
It is often stated here that gravitation and acceleration are the same.
This leads to seriously held statements that "gravity is not pulling me
down in my chair, but rather the chair is accelerating up towards me".
This only makes plausible sense if it is agreed that there is no peeking
out the window. IOW the theory depends in part on a stipulated
blindness. This is something that is seldom tolerated in science.
When confronted with real world thought experiments wherein the
statement that gravitation = acceleration is seriously made to appear
bad, defenders seek refuge from the assertion that gravitation =
acceleration, by pointing out that the statement refers only to LOCAL
phenomena. When pressed further it appears that the _dimension_ of the
adjective LOCAL is something a little bigger than a point which itself
is dimensionless. IOW no tests can be performed within the applicable
LOCAL area. (and therefore cannot be disproved)
Is this good science?
I would therefore guess that any hypothetical involving cities on
opposite sides of the earth cannot ever be used to challenge
gravity/acceleration concept of relativity, since relativity has limited
the scope of its statement to a LOCAL dimension.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: Bilge
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: Androcles
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- References:
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: Sue...
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- Prev by Date: Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?
- Next by Date: Re: The Cat is out of the bag
- Previous by thread: Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- Next by thread: Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|