Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: Joe Fischer <efischer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 21:55:04 -0400
On Wed, stephen@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>Joe Fischer <efischer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> You are assuming Euclidean space, the Moon moves
>> relative to the Earth as a result of at least two vectors, which
>> may not add as expected.
>
>What are these vectors?
I don't know, just relative motion, but the change
in unit intervals affects the radial distance differently than
it affects the tangential path.
> Explain how expansion describes the
>orbit of the moon.
It doesn't, if you mean matter expanding
guiding the path. Obviously if, hypothetically,
both the Earth and the Moon were expanding,
the path of the Moon would have to be an
outward spiral (if a temporary spatial reference
system is used).
If the universe were not expanding,
The Electrodynamic Divergence of Matter
model obviously could not have any merit.
It is said, but I have never found
the exact quote, that General Relativity
could have predicted an expanding universe
before the 100 inch telescope began operation.
It would be interesting to know why and
how General Relativity could have predicted
and expanding unverse.
>What sort of non-Euclidean space
>are you assuming,
None, of course. Space has no dimensions,
the spatial dimensions are simply distances of separation
using units related to matter.
So if matter expands, time must slow, per the
definition of time as the interval between two events
of something matter is doing.
>and what does it have to do with expansion?
>Stephen
If all of the effects of expanding matter were
simple and clear, somebody would have published
it all long ago.
I published some text descriptions in 1964
in Pasadena, but the best graphical representation
was published by James Carter about 1970 in L.A,
County or north of there in "Gravity Does Not Exist".
By not having any attributes, space is not a
factor in any way, and this allows the possibility of
inertial reference frames to exist as if space were
Euclidean.
The fact that space is not Eulidean in GR,
but absolutely must be in both SR and LET, should
suggest that space has no attributes, and is only the
distance between objects that is called space.
I would like to see James Carter make his
drawings available online, they seem identical to
some of the GR texts or popular books, but I
have only had one contact with him since 1974.
The expansion of matter along with the
non attributes of space, does produce a system
of mechanics that is much like Newton's, but
with a lot of the features of General Relativity.
I have been hoping to find somebody who
can think of physical processes in terms of the
expansion of matter, there is a lot to be gained
by anyone interested in gravity anything related.
I have written a lot about it in the last
10 years, only google knows it all, but under
various email addresses because of unwanted
commercial advertising received, and changing
the email address is the only way to stop it.
Joe Fischer
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: stephen
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- References:
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: Sue...
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: Daniel Weston
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: Harry
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: Harry
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- From: stephen
- Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- Prev by Date: Re: Androcles' and Henri's Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
- Next by Date: Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- Previous by thread: Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- Next by thread: Re: "Is There a Force of Gravity?"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
