A Possible Mechanism For Gravity Without Forces Acting at a Distance



Don't get ahead of me or yourself

Electrodynamic Divergence of Matter

This paper and this thread is not an attempt to formalize the model,
but more to lay the groundwork and provide some information about the
subject model to those capable and inclined enough to attempt formalization.

Starting with the least possible consideration, two spheres of equal
size and constant density large enough to have some measurable amount
of outward surface acceleration, first just touching each other in free space;
The expansion can be considered to result from the same close
range internal forces as in gases, but controlled in solids and liquids by
the inertial resistance of the outer parts of larger objects, gas, liquid, or
solid.

If all matter expands, the way gases do, this in itself, provides the
basis for a model of gravitation to use for thought experiments and possibly
for finding unexplored experiments to compare with other models.

Any attempt to separate the two spheres should be resisted by
the precise amount the two spheres are being accelerated apart by the
expanding surfaces.

Since the surface points in contact should be in inertial motion,
the centers of mass should be 4-accelerated apart by an amount that
is a whole proportion of the surface gravity of either sphere alone.
Is this acceleration 1, or 2 (in units of "s1-g" for a single sphere)?

Is the force needed to be applied a whole proportion of the
mass of one of the spheres, and is this force (in kg or pounds) 1 or 2?

If the two spheres are separated to one diameter apart, and
released, there will be a short period of time pass before the surfaces
come in contact.

If the two spheres are separated to two diameters apart, is
the time period before contact 1 or 2 times that of one diameter apart?

This will be slow going, with many bumps along the way.

Joe Fischer
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Full Tilt Rakeback questions...
    ... If you redeem Full Tilt Iron Man medals for $75 tokens, your rakeback ... your "managed money amount" Which is the net amount of money that you generate that month. ... You then receive 27% (I think that is the usual rake amount) of that final net number. ... So, it is probably correct to predict when you are not going to play for a while, spend all of your tokens, and then cash in your fpp points, wait for the time period to pass, then start generating rake again. ...
    (rec.gambling.poker)
  • Re: Drinking & driving
    ... >> pints of Stella? ... approx 4-5 units) and the admission that he had been ... > his unsteadyness is not automatically connected with the amount of alcohol ... You are also failing to take into account the time period over ...
    (uk.rec.driving)
  • Re: Drinking & driving
    ... YMMV. ... >> IIRC the number of units has no relevance to intoxication and the ... >> amount of alcohol consumed. ... >> account the time period over which this was comsumed and the amount ...
    (uk.rec.driving)
  • Re: Drinking & driving
    ... >>> IIRC the number of units has no relevance to intoxication and the ... >>> cause of his unsteadyness is not automatically connected with the ... >>> amount of alcohol consumed. ... >>> account the time period over which this was comsumed and the amount ...
    (uk.rec.driving)