sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Rule of The Arcana
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Re: Approximating the Universe
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Rule of The Arcana
  • From: Ben Bean
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?
  • From: jem
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Approximating the Universe
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Harry
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: relativity? paradox?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: anybody wants to read something in german?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: on bending of space time
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: relativity? paradox?
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: relativity? paradox?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• relativity? paradox?
  • From: Ulala
• Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: on bending of space time
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: anybody wants to read something in german?
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Approximating the Universe
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: em
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: em
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: em
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Approximating the Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: anybody wants to read something in german?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: on bending of space time
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: anybody wants to read something in german?
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?
  • From: Brad M
• Re: anybody wants to read something in german?
  • From: Brad M
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: oriel36
• Re: anybody wants to read something in german?
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?
  • From: PD
• Re: on bending of space time
  • From: Brad M
• Re: on bending of space time
  • From: Brad M
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: brian a m stuckless
• Re: anybody wants to read something in german?
  • From: Brad M
• Re: anybody wants to read something in german?
  • From: Brad M
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: on bending of space time
  • From: PD
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: Is the black hole's spin holding it up?
  • From: Brad M
• Re: Einstien, the father of this group
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Is the black hole's spin holding it up?
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: notch
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: stephen
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Retarded potential and funny clocks
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: ratcliff
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: anybody wants to read something in german?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: anybody wants to read something in german?
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: shevek
• Re: Some Troubling Assumptions of SRT
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: anybody wants to read something in german?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• anybody wants to read something in german?
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: G the gravitational constant
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: on bending of space time
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: G the gravitational constant
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• on bending of space time
  • From: fuzzlogic
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Feynman's Rainbow & String Theory
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Infinity a Concept
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Celebrating and Mourning in Einstein's Cult
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: surrealistic-dream@hotmai
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: doin physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: Bilge
• Re: doin physics
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Some Troubling Assumptions of SRT
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: bz
• Re: Give up Black Holes
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: em
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Retarded potential and funny clocks
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Retarded potential and funny clocks
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstien, the father of this group How about me being fatherhere
  • From: Harry
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: em
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: em
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: em
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Is this Right, which object or both has the attribute gravitational mass?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: What does "VIRGO" stand for?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Is this Right, which object or both has the attribute gravitational mass?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• What does "VIRGO" stand for?
  • From: Ian Shea
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: TomGee
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Einstien, the father of this group How about me being father here
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Einstien, the father of this group How about me being father here
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: symmetrical and asymmetrical twins
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: symmetrical and asymmetrical twins
  • From: Sue...
• Re: symmetrical and asymmetrical twins
  • From: looter
• symmetrical and asymmetrical twins
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: looter
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: looter
• Re: doin physics
  • From: looter
• Re: doin physics
  • From: looter
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light"
  • From: Tsom
• Re: a childish game
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Aetherist
• Einstein, the father of this group
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Relativity Basics: Bias, Bias, who's got the bias
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: bz
• Re: doin physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: doin physics
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: em
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: em
• Re: doin physics
  • From: Bilge
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: again space again new space
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: xxein
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Biological Evolution vs. Theological Creation
  • From: Bilge
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: G the gravitational constant
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: G the gravitational constant
  • From: xxein
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: djlockdown@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: doin physics
  • From: Neil G
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: Neil G
• Re: doin physics
  • From: Eric Gisse
• doin physics
  • From: Neil G
• G the gravitational constant
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Relativity Basics: Bias, Bias, who's got the bias
  • From: Neil G
• Re: Relativity Basics: Bias, Bias, who's got the bias
  • From: Neil G
• Re: Relativity Basics: Bias, Bias, who's got the bias
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: Neil G
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Neil G
• Re: Some Troubling Assumptions of SRT
  • From: Sue...
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Neil G
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Neil G
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: Androcles
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: fart
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Relativity Basics: Bias, Bias, who's got the bias
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Relativity Basics: Bias, Bias, who's got the bias
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: M D Meenken
• Re: a childish game
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: djlockdown@xxxxxxxxx
• Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: djlockdown@xxxxxxxxx
• Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: djlockdown@xxxxxxxxx
• Trying to Understand Relativity
  • From: djlockdown@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Aetherist
• I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Make Al Say Your Theory, Albert Einstein Generator
  • From: homeless . panhandler
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: ratcliff
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: ratcliff
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: ratcliff
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Unification question
  • From: main_engineering
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: jem
• "The Brilliance of Our Teachers"
  • From: Tsom
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Some Troubling Assumptions of SRT
  • From: kenseto
• a childish game
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: em
• Re: Biological Evolution vs. Theological Creation
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Biological Evolution vs. Theological Creation
  • From: main_engineering
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Save your world
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Relativity Basics: Bias, Bias, who's got the bias
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Velocity vector Magnitude & Direction, v.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Mike
• Re: Some Troubling Assumptions of SRT
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Velocity vector Magnitude & Direction, v.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Some Troubling Assumptions of SRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Harry
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "The Right Angle Lever Paradox"
  • From: Tsom
• Re: Some Troubling Assumptions of SRT
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: jem
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: Some Troubling Assumptions of SRT
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Harry
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Harry
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Harry
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Harry
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Harry
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Harry
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: Shrug
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Some Troubling Assumptions of SRT
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Shrug
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Some Troubling Assumptions of SRT
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Shrug
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Some Troubling Assumptions of SRT
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Shrug
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: again space again new space
  • From: resneli
• Re: isik hizina ulasan madde ne olur?
  • From: resneli
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• "How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?"
  • From: Tleb
• Re: The End of Zombie Science
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Harry
• DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Shrug
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Shrug
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: jem
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: em
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Harry
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Harry
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: again space again new space
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: isik hizina ulasan madde ne olur?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The planet orbiting Algol.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The End of Zombie Science
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity, Translation
  • From: oriel36
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Harry
• Re: isik hizina ulasan madde ne olur?
  • From: resneli
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: dwhig265
• again space again new space
  • From: resneli
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Helmut Wabnig
• Androcle is right, N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) is a stupid nazi parrot
  • From: Tex VG
• Re: isik hizina ulasan madde ne olur?
  • From: Tex VG
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: PD
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Retarded potential and funny clocks
  • From: Sue...
• "The Paradox of Zeno"
  • From: Tleb
• Re: Retarded potential and funny clocks
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: PD
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Harry
• Re: Retarded potential and funny clocks
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: isik hizina ulasan madde ne olur?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Harry
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: isik hizina ulasan madde ne olur?
  • From: Androcles
• Shrug
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity, Translation
  • From: Harry
• Re: isik hizina ulasan madde ne olur?
  • From: resneli
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Synthetic Telepathy, Tachyons, and NDE's
  • From: Raktizer Omheit
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: xxein
• Re: Synthetic Telepathy, Tachyons, and NDE's
  • From: Raktizer Omheit
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spinning black holes and dragging of space
  • From: vanep
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: PD
• Re: SR and rates
  • From: Paul Cardinale
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity, Translation
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: ratcliff
• Re: Blasts froim the past.
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Harry
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: PD
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: TomGee
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: Andreas Most
• Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
  • From: TomGee
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Harry
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Harry
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: em
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: shuba
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Synthetic Telepathy, Tachyons, and NDE's
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Synthetic Telepathy, Tachyons, and NDE's
  • From: xxein
• Re: The planet orbiting Algol.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The planet orbiting Algol.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The Eternal Triangle:- Politics, Science and Religion.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: extra dimenssion
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: isik hizina ulasan madde ne olur?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Synthetic Telepathy, Tachyons, and NDE's
  • From: Raktizer Omheit
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• The Eternal Triangle:- Politics, Science and Religion.
  • From: Arthur Knight
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The planet orbiting Algol.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: At least one thing dumber then ether
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: PD
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Did I miss this, "Einstein paper published in 2005"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: PD
• Re: Did I miss this, "Einstein paper published in 2005"
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: PD
• Re: At least one thing dumber then ether
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: shevek
• "The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe"
  • From: Tleb
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: vern
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity, Translation
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: vern
• Re: meridians as geodesics
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The planet orbiting Algol.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Retarded potential and funny clocks
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but anemerg...
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: meridians as geodesics
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: bz
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Harry
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Harry
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Harry
• Re: The planet orbiting Algol.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: em
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: em
• Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Bilge
• At least one thing dumber then ether
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: extra dimenssion
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: isik hizina ulasan madde ne olur?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: spr is defunct.(KST)=> better physics.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The planet orbiting Algol.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity, Translation
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: spr is defunct.(KST)=> better physics.
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: a new reward
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: significant zero
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: significant zero
• Re: extra dimenssion
  • From: Lynx Xiong
• Re: extra dimenssion
  • From: Lynx Xiong
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Lynx Xiong
• Re: isik hizina ulasan madde ne olur?
  • From: Lynx Xiong
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: PD
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: oriel36
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: ratcliff
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: significant zero
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: significant zero
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: significant zero
• Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there
  • From: Lynx Xiong
• Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies
  • From: Lynx Xiong
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity, Translation
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Lynx Xiong
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: ratcliff
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Retarded potential and funny clocks
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: bz
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Spookfeed's movie.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: significant zero
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: significant zero
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: ratcliff
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
  • From: mathexpert
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: Sue...
• Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: significant zero
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Light Speed refutes Special Relativity, Translation
  • From: Stan Byers
• Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emerg...
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: The planet orbiting Algol.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Spookfeed's movie.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: The planet orbiting Algol.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: isik hizina ulasan madde ne olur?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: isik hizina ulasan madde ne olur?
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: ratcliff
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: isik hizina ulasan madde ne olur?
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: SR and rates
  • From: Todd
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: ratcliff
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: ratcliff
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: kenseto
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Spookfeed's movie.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• isik hizina ulasan madde ne olur?
  • From: resneli
• Spookfeed's movie.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: ratcliff
• Re: Retarded potential and funny clocks
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Retarded potential and funny clocks
  • From: Sue...
• "Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?"
  • From: Woleb
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Retarded potential and funny clocks
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The planet orbiting Algol.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: kenseto
• Re: meridians as geodesics
  • From: Sue...
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: PD
• Re: I caught a bottle of photons
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: I caught a bottle of photons
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: I caught a bottle of photons
  • From: Sue...
• Retarded potential and funny clocks
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Lorentzian grainy space
  • From: pekka . virtanen
• Re: meridians as geodesics
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: I caught a bottle of photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: I caught a bottle of photons
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: I caught a bottle of photons
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: em
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: ratcliff
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: ratcliff
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: extra dimenssion
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Noitall
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: dwhig265
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism
  • From: Bilge
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: ratcliff
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: absolute and relative launch pad
  • From: kenseto
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: PD
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: PD
• "A Snapshot of a Photon"
  • From: Woleb
• Re: absolute and relative launch pad
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Harry
• Re: absolute and relative launch pad
  • From: kenseto
• Re: SR and rates
  • From: dseppala
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: jem
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Black Knight
• Hey, Village Idiot!
  • From: AllYou!
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: shuba
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Harry
• Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Are relativists some kind of sect? Mathematical funambulism, systems of units, and Newtonian limit
  • From: Juan R.
• Re: The End of Zombie Science
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: how to understand a tensor
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Bilge
• Re: non-relativistic
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Attraction VS geometry
  • From: Bilge
• Re: absolute and relative launch pad
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Falling space
  • From: Dr Photon
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Harry
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Jim Heckman
• Re: Annus Mirabilis Papers (from Annus mirabilis, Latin for 'year of wonders')
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: The End of Zombie Science
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: The planet orbiting Algol.
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: extra dimenssion
  • From: C.A.M
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: TomGee
• Re: meridians as geodesics
  • From: Igor Lukacevic
• Re: Falling space
  • From: M D Meenken
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism
  • From: Spoonfed
• Annus Mirabilis Papers (from Annus mirabilis, Latin for 'year of wonders')
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: The End of Zombie Science
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: Non-expanding universe
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The planet orbiting Algol.
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.
  • From: Black Knight
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: extra dimenssion
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: johnreed take 1B --- 2005
  • From: shuba
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: shuba
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism
  • From: Spoonfed
• Re: Spinning black holes and dragging of space
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Spinning black holes and dragging of space
  • From: Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Re: Visualizing curved space-time objectively & locally
  • From: em
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Eotvos.
  • From: em
• Re: johnreed take 1B --- 2005
  • From: randamajor
• Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Lorentzian grainy space
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
  • From: C.A.M
• Re: The End of Zombie Science
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Expansion and balloon analogy
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: The planet orbiting Algol.