Re: a question about conservation and photons
- From: bz <bz+sp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:32:11 +0000 (UTC)
Tom Roberts <tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in news:dkafiq$o20
@netnews.net.lucent.com:
> bz wrote:
>> According to the Feynman lectures, EVERYTHING is particles.
>
> Yes. In fact, there has NEVER been an observation of any continuous,
> extended object. Except for poor and/or inaccurate observations (e.g.
> our everyday lives in which everything _appears_ to be continuous).
>
Time? Of course perhaps you object that it is not an object.
--
bz
please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.
bz+sp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
.
- References:
- Re: a question about conservation and photons
- From: bz
- Re: a question about conservation and photons
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: a question about conservation and photons
- Prev by Date: Re: a question about conservation and photons
- Next by Date: Re: a question about conservation and photons
- Previous by thread: Re: a question about conservation and photons
- Next by thread: Re: a question about conservation and photons
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|