Re: a question about conservation and photons
- From: bz <bz+sp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 10:15:23 +0000 (UTC)
"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:1130999729.180370.249460@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>
> bz wrote:
>> "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>> news:1130958922.495015.153310@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>
>> >
>> > bz wrote:
>> >> "N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)" <N: dlzc1 D:cox T:net@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> wrote in M63af.264$bo.108@fed1read01:">news:M63af.264$bo.108@fed1read01:
>> >>
>> ....
>> >> .... Imagine that the absorber and emitter are
>> >> on opposite sides of the universe or at least separated by long
>> >> distance and or time.
>> >
>> > Gee... Will Coulomb force reach that far ?
>>
>> Last time we looked it reached something over 10 Billion Light years.
>>
>> >
>> > << The magnetic multipole fields have a non-vanishing
>> > radial component of the magnetic field,
>> > while the electric multipole fields have a
>> > non-vanishing radial component of the electric
>> > field. Because the normal component of magnetic
>> > field vanishes at the surface of a perfect
>> > conductor, while the normal component of the
>> > electric field does not, we conclude that the
>> > spherical antenna has only electric multipole fields. >>
>> > http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0506053
>> >
>> > ;-)
>> >
>> > Sue...
>>
>> Last time I tried to construct a spherical antenna, the supply house
>> said they were short of perfect conductor sheeting. Short sheeting can
>> be surprising and painful.
>
> Your 'stand up comedy' is suggesting more and more that
> your calling may be in the field of physics. :o)
I usually sit, 'cause I can't stand my own puns.
>
> Have you ever wondered what the resistance of an
> atom's electron 'shell' is?
>
Elementry, my dear Sue. It seems to depend on the on the ratio of protons
to electrons.
After watching the Feynman lectures, I am suffering from 'shell shock'.
He seems to have been very resistant to the idea of shells. The
interchange of particles seems to be what hold all together.
--
bz
please pardon my infinite ignorance, the set-of-things-I-do-not-know is an
infinite set.
bz+sp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove ch100-5 to avoid spam trap
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: a question about conservation and photons
- From: Sue...
- Re: a question about conservation and photons
- References:
- Re: a question about conservation and photons
- From: bz
- Re: a question about conservation and photons
- From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: a question about conservation and photons
- From: bz
- Re: a question about conservation and photons
- From: Sue...
- Re: a question about conservation and photons
- From: bz
- Re: a question about conservation and photons
- From: Sue...
- Re: a question about conservation and photons
- Prev by Date: Re: 377 ohms ?
- Next by Date: Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.
- Previous by thread: Re: a question about conservation and photons
- Next by thread: Re: a question about conservation and photons
- Index(es):