Re: Falling in curves


"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1131167177.701739.59960@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Joe Fischer wrote:
>> On 4 Nov 2005 19:55:16 -0800, "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> >Joe Fischer wrote:
>> >> It would be nice if you could help keep the nuts, flakes,
>> >> and cranks in line. :-)
>> >> I am just one of the cranks, very interested in gravity,
>> >> who wants to promote keeping Einstein's Principle of Equivalence
>> >> in the forefront, and possibly even applying it literally.
>> >> But I am not elegible for mensa.org, or able to work with
>> >> the formulas you used, but can probably follow them.
>> >>
>> >> There are just so many ways and methods discussed
>> >> in these groups, and most of them are way out of favor with
>> >> professionals,
>> >
>> >"Professional$" understand that what you wear can be
>> >a$ important a$ where you wear it. BTW... Don't
>> >'Brownie' just look smashing in that Nordstroms ?
>> >I hope he doesn't get any perspiration stains on it. ;-)
>> >Sue...
>>
>> That is what "professional" means, someone who
>> makes a living at it.
>>
>> If you could put a little more physics in your chats,
>> I might be able to reduce the length of my "nuts and flakes" list. :-)
>
> Please keep me on your nuts and flakes list 'till you realise
> that it is no value to explain inertia in terms of inertia. ;-)
>
> Sue...
Principle of Equivalence:
Being accelerated inside an elevator cage or rocket feels just like gravity,
except you go somewhere else. It has nothing whatever to do with
magnets sticking to fridge doors or pith balls sticking to combs.
These are not "equivalent" and are off topic.
Oh, and Einstein's nuts and flakes are better than Kellogg's All Bran.
I prefer bacon and eggs myself.
Androcles.




.