Re: force




significant zero wrote:
> "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1131181506.305345.277030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> |
> | significant zero wrote:
> | > "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> | > news:1131139215.491051.228040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> | > snip|
>
> snip
>
> |The moustache would look better in italics to express some puzzlement.
>
> Cant do italics scissors are too blunt, (:}) air force mode.
LOL
>
> | The other questions sound loaded so I need to refer to some T.R.
> posts
> | to
> | be sure the nested abstractions are abstract enough. ;-)
> |
> | Space is what keeps dis-similar charges and cultures
> | from anhilating each other.
>
> Nice one but it it suggests that charges and cultures are made of
> something other than space

I certainly hope they are different.
I can put my earrings in a space.
I might get a zap or a pathogen if I put them in
a charge or a culture ?

> and brings up a can of worms.

Eeeeeeyuck! I wouldn't put them in a can of worms either.

> Would it perhaps be more accurate (given no real knowledge)
> to say that space is
> differences in existence with the same statement being true for matter
> and its effects. ?

Not till ya show us a charge-pair conjured from light.
I know there have been some recent attempts but I
don't have the URL handy.

>
> | Time is an abstraction that relates such anhilation to
> | space.
>
> An abstraction of space ?

Space doesn't need further abstraction other than x,y,z.

Time is an abstraction that expresses the *relationship*
between displacement and mass/energy conservation.

>
> |
> | << the energy is conserved if and only if the physical laws are
> | invariant under time translations (if their form does not depend on
> | time) >>
> | http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noether's_theorem
> |
> | Howzat, Mr. Moustache?
> | Sue...
>
> Balls to stump as they may say in cricket (:})
>
> Do you (or Noether) mean local time or average(cosmic) time in which
> this poorly defined condition (that cannot include time) is connserved

The time as measured by the drag-strip official's watch or the
fuelers calibrated can. Neither knows if a car improves it elapsed
time by getting lighter or exerting more force because F = ma.
Both can detect an improvement.

IOW... a rail passenger three galaxies away will note a correlation
between the fuel used and the official's watch unless lightning
strikes them simultaneously. :o)

Sue...



> ?
>
> Sig zoro

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: force
    ... You seem to be saying that you think charges, ... |> | Time is an abstraction that relates such anhilation to ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: force
    ... significant zero wrote: ... > |> snip ... we can easily measure between charges. ... > | Space doesn't need further abstraction other than x,y,z. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: force
    ... |The moustache would look better in italics to express some puzzlement. ... Cant do italics scissors are too blunt, ... An abstraction of space? ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Hydro or Wind Power
    ... Tim Lamb writes ... >Less the EA charges for abstraction and discharge:-( ... I doubt very much these would be significant, possibly zero. ...
    (uk.business.agriculture)