Re: How do you Interpret the Lorentz transform


"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1131000157.910842.142850@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> King Coffee wrote:
>> I know we're growing tried of this newsgroup communication. You make your
>> understanding clear to me. Part of the problem is the terminology. For
>> instance, when I say a stationary point O(x1, t1) I'm implying a fix
>> space-time point. You refer I'm addressing a spatial point. When I say
>> compensating for distance I'm implying, a calculated time difference, the
>> time needed for event information to move from x = x1 to x = 0, or visa
>> versa. You called it calculation the source probe signal and the echo
>> probe
>> signal. You define two timing signals ts and te. I define one, an event
>> detector signal, from the event to the observer, a source signal is
>> superficial. This is evident, since ts = -te and you need to know x1.
>>
>> Thank you for your time, effort, and patience.
>>
>> Sincerely,
>> King
>
> Yet another case for a multilingual society.
> http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0204034
>
> Caviar Escargo!
> Sue...

Snail eggs? That strongly suggests salmonella...
Caveat emptor.
Androcles.


.