Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: shuba <tim.shuba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 14:57:09 -0600
John Kennaugh wrote:
> I have now had time to look at the maths
> you suggested I studied.
Then why do you need to write obfuscatory crap about light
clocks? You never addressed the mathematics at all, except to
show that you reject mathematical explanations out of hand. You
are even so mathematically inept that you object to starting out
with the most general case of a linear transformation. There
simply isn't much hope for a veteran crackpot such as yourself to
learn anything about relativity, since you are still hung up on
source dependence and light clocks after four decades.
---TIm Shuba---
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- References:
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: shuba
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: shuba
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: shuba
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- Prev by Date: Re: Re-aligning astronomical principles
- Next by Date: Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids
- Previous by thread: Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- Next by thread: Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
