Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
- From: "Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 23:30:21 +0100
Androcles wrote:
"Paul B. Andersen" <paul.b.andersen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:dkfrga$cn0$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Androcles wrote:
Paul B. Andersen wrote:
SR predicts that both the wavelength and frequency of EM-radiation are Doppler shifted.
The ballistic theory predicts that the frequency of the EM-wave is Doppler shifted, but the the wavelength is not.
Measurements prove that both wavelength and frequency are Doppler shifted.
SR is confirmed, the ballistic theory is falsified.
Paul
Prove that SR predicts that both the wavelength and frequency of EM-radiation are Doppler shifted. Quote the paper where it even mentions wavelength.
Androcles
lambda*f = c c is invariant
Do I have to make the tyny steps smaller?
Yes. A claim is not a prediction. In babble a "prediction" doesn't mean "because I say so", although it may mean that in tusseltongue. Please make your tyny steps smaller and QUOTE the paper where it mentions wavelength. Androcles.
You can stay so incredible ignorant that you don't know that SR predicts that both the wavelength and frequency of EM-radiation are Doppler shifted.
Not my problem.
Paul
.
- References:
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
- From: Androcles
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
- From: Androcles
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
- From: Paul B. Andersen
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
- From: Androcles
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
- Prev by Date: Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- Next by Date: Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
- Previous by thread: Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
- Next by thread: Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|