Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: shuba <tim.shuba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2005 19:33:23 -0600
John Kennaugh wrote:
> However it can say nothing whatsoever re Galilean Relativity, because in
> terms of Galilean Relativity, it introduces an infinity into the maths.
You can use a limit if you want and not worry about whether
anything travels at c, which is a point irrelevant to the
relativity principle per se. Despite all your protestations and
hand-waving, you still have a lot of work to do to invalidate the
mathematics of Lie groups, and their clear and well-studied
connections to relativity.
> You can start with the general case if you wish. It does not prove
> relativity is right it only proves in a complex and roundabout
> mathematical way that if you assume the second postulate
The derivation proceeds from the first postulate only. You are
completely full of ***, as you confirm in every post.
---Tim Shuba---
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- References:
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: shuba
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: shuba
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: shuba
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: shuba
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- Prev by Date: Re: The absolute aging of the twins
- Next by Date: Re: Working Wrong Concepts
- Previous by thread: Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- Next by thread: Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- Index(es):