Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.


"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
news:ee7um1l0pjc5nesn1ld2mmdgr0nccp8024@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Mon, 07 Nov 2005 02:05:56 GMT, "Androcles" <Me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
>
>>>>Tombaugh in 1930 so its only done 30% of its orbit; you'll have to find
>>>>a
>>>>better reason for the double maxima with your lucky white heather
>>>>"theory"
>>>>of 10 - 30 light years extinction distance, cos you are the only person
>>>>in
>>>>the world you'll convince, unless you include a five-year-old kid. It
>>>>might
>>>>be suitable for them, they still believe in Santa.
>>>>Empirical data says you are wrong, Wilson.
>>>
>>> What empirical data?
>>
>>V 1493Aql, of course. Empirical data says you are wrong, Wilson.
>>What the *** do you think I was talking about, peas for dinner?
>>Go on, play stupid like any aetherialist and pretend it isn't there.
>>Message rating 3 bottles.
>
> The britastro V 1493 Aql curve is pretty useless.

Use this one instead:
http://astro.sci.muni.cz/lehky/nova/aql_1493.vis
J.D. Mag
2451377.500 11.7
2451434.347 15.0

Or this
Zpráva o èinnosti za rok 2003
"V 1493 Aql an extremely distant nova."

Wilson can't match the data, therefore the data is useless.
Wilson is an aetherialist, therefore the data is useless and should be
ignored.
Why should the data be ignored?
It doesn't fit Wilson's "Wheory". Wilson has his head up his arse.
Wilson is a pretty useless no-nothing stoopid abo and was never
once any kind of physicist.
Message rating, 20 bottles.

Androcles.


.

Quantcast