Re: A little challenge for relativists.


"shuba" <tim.shuba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:tim.shuba-902F30.04550710112005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> O'Harraugh wrote:
>
> > "shuba" <tim.shuba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> > > For the record, the educator being bashed in this thread by John
> > > Kennaugh and Harald Van Lintel is a David Morin of Harvard
> > > University.
>
> > Those who read the messages of this thread (or check it with
> > Google) will notice that I didn't "bash" David Morin at all.
>
> I gave the backup mathematics for my argument by Morin, which
> Harald Van Lintel called "irrelevant" and "a cheap trick". Van
> Lintel's words are virtually idenical to how John Kennaugh
> referred to Morin's work in his bashing of Morin in message
> <O9Z7LwCU+LcDFwkG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.

As everyone's comments are available, that Tim Shuba links to the wrong
person's comments is a very transparent dishonesty -- that's the kind of
thing I call "cheap tricks". So now you try to cover up that you can't read.
How could you ever finish school? Oh of course, because you know math.
FYI, this whole thread is *not* about math, and thus it's completely beyond
your understanding.
By chance, also Morin pointed out what Kennaugh argued -- here it is again:

It is easy to imagine a universe where the speed of light depends on the
frame of reference. Light could behave like a baseball, for example.

Harald


.