Re: force
- From: "significant zero" <paulps@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Nov 2005 08:51:39 -0800
Sue... wrote:
> significant zero wrote:
> > Sue... wrote:
> > > significant zero wrote:
> > > > This is google under opera no spelling checker on this machine yet.
> > > >
> > > > Sue... wrote:
> > > > > significant zero wrote:
> > > > > > "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:1131452825.331379.27490@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > |
> > > > > > | significant zero wrote:
> > > > > > | > |
> > > > > > | > | significant zero wrote:
> > > > > > | > | > "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > > > > | > | > news:1131181506.305345.277030@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > | > | > |
> > > > > > | > | > | significant zero wrote:
> > > > > > | > | > | > "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> > > > > > | > | > | >
> > > > > > news:1131139215.491051.228040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > > | > | > | > snip|
> > > > > > | > | >
> > > > > > | > | > snip
> > > > > > | > snip
> > > > > > | > | > Nice one but it it suggests that charges and cultures are made
> > > > > > of
> > > > > > | > | > something other than space
> > > > > > | > |
> > > > > > | > | I certainly hope they are different.
> > > > > > | >
> > > > > > | > Different yes but of the same basic substance ? time/space ?
> > > > > > |
> > > > > > | I expect a house to be built of bricks, and bricks of sand.
> > > > > > | I wouldn't expect a house to be built of miniature houses.
> > > > > > | Why do you expect matter to be built of matter?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > That is not what I was saying I was saying that matter was an aspect of
> > > > > > time/space i.e compressed time space that exists within less compressed
> > > > > > time
> > > > > > space.
> > > > >
> > > > > You are substituting the word space for ether.
> > > >
> > > > That the opinion of a dentist (:-)
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes... I am being picky.
> > > > > We can define H W D to be all on the same axis
> > > > > compute its volume but it will represent no space.
> > > >
> > > > Volume is not applicable to single axis time or space, distance is the
> > > > normal result.
> > > Oh? 1/r^2 describes a volume.
> >
> > No an area
> >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > If there were a place where unlike charges did not
> > > > > exist or did not attract... we could still compute its
> > > > > volume.
> > > >
> > > > Only if had at least 3 axis.
> > > Give it as many as you like.
> >
> > Volume is only applicable to space with 3 axis or more
> > Area 2 axis
> > Distance 1 axis
> > To preserve or make real any of them you need a time axis
> >
> > >
> > > A vacuum pump moves charges, not dimensions.
> >
> > Modifies dimensions.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > It would be space... but nothing like the one
> > > > > that we live in.
> > > >
> > > > If charges did not exist or function then time and space may not exist
> > > > or function,
> > >
> > > We don't have to have a charge pair in a space to compute
> > > the force between a pair, if introduced into the space.
> >
> > Oh! what do you mean by that.
>
> You are attributing the properties of charge pairs to regions
> that you *decree* to be space. Who made you emperor of the
> world ? :o)
The cat voted me in by two to one.(:-)
>
> We know magic things occur between charges but we have
> not a clue what happens in their absence.
>
Resorting to magic as an explanation leaves me a bit unconvinced (:-)
This is my explanation for what its worth. If time\space is twisted
enough it may becomes manifest to us as matter. Matter twists the
surrounding time\space and this appears to us as a field
(gravitational, electric or magnetic) all being a soft twisting of the
time\space surrounding a piece of hard twisted space. The character of
a charge (type of hard twisting) dictates soft twisting of the
surrounding time\space. The only magic in this is to describe the
twisting in terms that are universally understandable.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Our ability to imagine or measure volumes has no
> > > > > relation to phenomena that might occur in the volume.
> > > >
> > > > Are you shure of that ?
> > > Yes. A witch measures a volume in spherical or rectangular
> > > co-ordinates and compute a different result but chant and
> > > incantations produce the same result. :o)
> >
> > A warlock says stop pissing about and smacks her bum (:-)
> Well I am not going to play mathematical semantics with you.
> A peek at a neighboring sub-thread suggest it is you that needs the
> smack on the bum.
>
> We have:
> F = ma
>
> but if we want to be more general in application we can say:
>
> F = { p(m1) q(M2) r(M3) }a
>
> where
> m1 = test mass
> M2 = earth's mass
> M3 = mass of the universe
>
> p,q,r are the apropriate functions
> r(M2) is what Einstein expresses as a curvature.
>
> IOW... the earth is in a tug o' war with the remainder of the
> universe to take posession of the test mass.
> A point exist between moon and earth, beyond which
> the earth cannot win the contest.
>
> Consider your bum smacked.
> 1/r^2
>
> Sue...
>
Thanks (:-)
> > snip
> >
> > sig z
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: force
- From: Sue...
- Re: force
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: David McAnally - please help with limits and infinities
- Next by Date: Re: absolute and relative launch pad
- Previous by thread: Re: force
- Next by thread: Re: force
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
