Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!


"Gerald L. O'Barr" <globarr@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1131661749.939496.19980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> The physical motions of photons in free space
> are absolutely equal!
>
> Yes, let us take a fixed inertial line in free
> space, and let points A and B be fixed points upon
> this line. At point A, let there be two objects
> moving upon this line at two different velocities,
> positioned such that they will cross point A at the
> same instant of time. At the instant they cross
> point A, let them both send a photon towards point B.
> Both photons will physically reach point B at the
> same instant of time.
> (Sub note: Each 'object' that simultaneously met at
> point A can each actually represent a whole inertial
> reference frame, in which they are each at rest. And
> we will let each frame extend to both points A and B
> and beyond. Thus, each photon emitted by each
> object are each traveling in their own different inertial
> reference frame at all times.)
> Now please note, at any point on this original
> line, as measured by any object on this line, no
> matter what velocity any object might be moving on
> this line, will show that at any meeting of any one
> of these photons, will instantaneously include the
> meeting of the other photon. Thus, step by step, at
> every point, by all observers (by all inertial
> frames), moving or not moving one way or the other,
> they will all confirm that these two photons, sent by
> two differently moving objects, moving in different
> reference frames, will be physically moving together
> in an absolute way across the space they are using.
>
> Thus, something exists in this space, that
> controls the rate at which all photons physically
> move, no matter what their original source might have
> been, and no matter what reference frame they are in.

Upto here, both Lorentz and Einstein would have agreed.

> This concept is absolute, and it absolutely
> tells us that there is an absolute reference that
> controls these physical acts.

This is where Einstein disagreed, but AFAIK he didn't explain his reasoning.
Is there someone here who is able to explain Einstein's reasoning on this?

> There is no logic that
> exists that can defeat this concept. LET satisfies
> this logic, and it is the only presently existing
> science that accomplishes or satisfies this logic.
> QED!
>
> Now I do not wish to argue this point with one
> single soul! There is nothing at all to argue. All
> photons do physically move together, no matter what
> velocity existed in their original frame of origin,
> and they cannot do this unless they each are being
> affected by something common.
> It is my opinion that all SR experts are insane,
> because they refuse to consider physical facts.

As I told you before, a number of respected SR experts *presented* such
physical facts and argued their logical conclusion to the scientific
community in highly esteemed journals.

Harald

> To
> assume that only math facts are important is insane,
> and I no longer care to talk to SR experts. There is
> no reason to ever talk to people who are insane, and
> refuse to consider that a physical reality, and the
> physical facts of that reality, must be known and
> understood before any math fact can be considered or
> used or understood.
> You SR experts seem to enjoy your stupidity. So
> be it! But you have all died. You have all died as
> to things that have intellectual importance! And I
> no longer care! Not one of you will dare consider
> any of these things, and for this, you are more than
> stupid! You are insane.
>
> Thanks for reading.
> Gerald L. O'Barr <globarr...@xxxxxxxxx>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: SR theory is simplistic
    ... from earth but emitters are not. ... The sources move after the photons are emitted. ... other is riding on a moving platform. ... The 'closing velocity' as seen by an observer NOT in the FoR of the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR theory is simplistic
    ... distance from earth but emitters are not. ... The sources move after the photons are emitted. ... The other is riding on a moving platform. ... The 'closing velocity' as seen by an observer NOT in the FoR of the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR theory is simplistic
    ... from earth but emitters are not. ... The sources move after the photons are emitted. ... other is riding on a moving platform. ... The 'closing velocity' as seen by an observer NOT in the FoR of the ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: SR theory is simplistic
    ... from earth but emitters are not. ... The sources move after the photons are emitted. ... is riding on a moving platform. ... velocity and take the same time to run the course. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • The physical motions of photons in free space!
    ... moving upon this line at two different velocities, ... Both photons will physically reach point B at the ... reference frame, in which they are each at rest. ... because they refuse to consider physical facts. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)