Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.


Henri Wilson wrote:

[snip]

>
> Ghost you have an amazing ability to turn simple problems into most difficult
> and totally unrelated tests of intellectual stamina..
>
> Here is my question again:
>
> ->O1___________________<-P
> <-O2
>
> A light pulse is directed towards differently moving observers O1 and O2.
> It is clearly closing on the two at different speeds.

Insanity: Doing the same thing over and over expecting a different
result each time.

>
> WHY SHOULD THEY BOTH CALCULATE THE SAME VALUE OF C FROM THEIR INDIVIDUAL
> MEASUREMENTS OF MAXWELL'S TWO CONSTANTS?

That is what Maxwell's equations trivially show, and which is
consistant with experiment.

WHY DO YOU KEEP ASKING THE SAME STUPID FUCKING QUESTION OVER AND OVER
WHEN WE GIVE YOU THE SAME ANSWER EVERY TIME?

>
> Please don't rely on aether theory to get youself out of trouble.

Every time you get an answer in terms of modern physics, you call it an
aether theory then dismiss it.

Then you turn around and babble about "local EM reference frames" and
"H-aether". Your intellectual dishonesty is absolutely disgusting.

>
>
>
> HW.
> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
> see: www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/variablestars.exe
>
> "Sometimes I feel like a complete failure.
> The most useful thing I have ever done is prove Einstein wrong".

.

Quantcast