Re: A little challenge for relativists.


shuba wrote:
> O'Harraugh wrote:
>
> > FYI, this whole thread is *not* about math, and thus it's completely beyond
> > your understanding.
>
> I posted both the physics and the mathematics. Among other
> things, it shows why the ether has no place in relativity, which
> is a theory about symmetry. I suspect that is the real reason
> Harald Van Lintel bashes educators and physicists like David
> Morin.
>
> > By chance, also Morin pointed out what Kennaugh argued -- here it is again:
> >
> > It is easy to imagine a universe where the speed of light depends on the
> > frame of reference. Light could behave like a baseball, for example
>
> This is the Galilean case where c = \infinity. I touched on this
> in my initial response.
>
> What ***-for-brains Kennaugh wrote was "but just in case anyone
> else mistakes the chunk of maths he referred to as showing
> anything relevant I thought I would explain what is going on."
>
> ***-for-brains Kennaugh was and still is bashing David Morin,
> and Harald Van Lintel is supportive of this. Neither of you
> kooks are fooling anyone.

The David Morin paper amplifies the *meta* and attenuates the
*physics* of Einstein's cartoon musings.

For that kind of entertainment... I prefer David Copperfield.
Get smart or learn stronger profanity.
http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0204034

Sue...

>
>
> ---Tim Shuba---

.

Quantcast