Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!




Black Knight wrote:
> "PD" <TheDraperFamily@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1132165881.437743.42330@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Black Knight wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "Common" sense is all to often common nonsense. Copernicus
> >> showed that. Almost every scientific breakthrough is the result of
> >> the individual departing from "common" sense. Relativity is common
> >> nonsense.
> >> Only a fuckwit would claim the velocity of light is defined as the
> >> Hobbit's
> >> "There and Back Again".
> >>
> >
> > And yet you use "common sense" as an argument for why velocities should
> > add algebraically.
> >
> > PD
> It would stupid not to.
> Velocities are distances divided by times, by DEFINITION.
> If you are going to compose velocities you are composing distances.

This of course presumes that in composing velocities for two different
inertial frames, the time scales are universal and common to both, i.e.
an absolute Newtonian time. And this is precisely the presumption that
is not good.

PD

.


Quantcast