Re: The planet orbiting Algol.


"The Ghost In The Machine" <ewill@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:l92s43-921.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> In sci.physics.relativity, Black Knight
> <Androcles@xxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote
> on Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:19:55 GMT
> <LWuef.8993$6A4.3040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> Finder=Google
> Source=Galileo Galilei
> Destination=Grand Duchess Christina of Tuscany
> Date=1615
> Reference=http://www.ship.edu/~cgboeree/galileo.html
> Reference=http://people.bu.edu/dklepper/RN242/duchess.html

Five brownie points to Ghost!


>
> Analysis begins.
>
>> "Well, the passage of time has revealed to everyone
>> the truths that I previously set forth; and, together
>> with the truth of the facts, there has come to light
>> the great difference in attitude between those who
>> simply and dispassionately refused to admit the
>> discoveries to be true, and those who combined with
>> their incredulity some reckless passion of their own.
>
> Hmm..lessee.
>
> Discoveries:
>
> [1] Aql1493 conclusively proves c'=c+v, without even so much
> as an equation.

c' = c+v IS an equation.
The one you are seeking is SUM(0->period/delta_T) photon_arrival (D/(c+v))
where v is derived from E = M-e.sin(E), D the distance from
Earth to the star.


>
> [2] Einstein is proven wrong by using various methods; the ones
> of note are:
>
> [a] Relatives moving at a relatively high speed.
> [b] A turtle.
> [c] A mosquito, ladder, a fire hydrant, and a pair of firemen.
> [d] An equation.

[d] An equation.
x = AB, -x = BA
(AB + BA)/(t'A -tA) = c = 0.
sqrt(1-v^2/0^2) = pick any value you like, it's undefined.

>
> [3] Muons are superluminal and may last longer than 2.2 microseconds,
> in their own reference frame.

Nonsense. Muons last 2.2 microseconds.
The Earth moves at 15c in the frame of the muon.

When asked if New York stops at this train, Galileo said "Yes".
Einstein said "To a first approximation for small quantities, as Galileo
has shown and I've called the "Principle of Relativity".
Does New York stop at this fuckin' train or not, phuckwit?

> [4] Accelerators cannot accelerate faster than light.

Accelerators cannot accelerate particles faster than light
in the frame of the accelerator. Usual lthe accelerator is
moving at 0.0001c around the sun, so the particles often
exceed the speed of light (in the frame of the sun) .

> [5] Pound-Rebka disproves SR.

I'd have to look into that.

>
> [6] Sagnac disproves SR.

Definitely.
"But the ray moves relatively to the initial point of k, when measured in
the stationary system, with the velocity c-v..."
The other ray (the one that goes the opposite ) moves relatively to the
initial point of k, when measured in the stationary system, with the
velocity c+v.

[rest snipped. You will lose concentration if I write more and you'll snip
anyway]
Androcles.


.

Quantcast