Re: A little challenge for relativists.


"shuba" <tim.shuba@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:tim.shuba-8C365C.20111617112005@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> The Dunce wrote:
>
>> But I find John
>> Kennaugh's reasoning sound.
>
> Now there's a fine voice of support. Maybe he'll join your cult
> worship group. Did you look at the the paper that Kennaugh
> thinks he discredited? Did you understand any of it? No? I'm
> not surprised.
>
>
> ---TIm Shuba---
As opposed to your cult worshipping group?
The paper is a fucking disgrace, written by a huckster.
Did you understand
[quote]
we establish by definition that the "time" required by a turtle to travel
from A to B equals the "time" it requires to travel from B to A.
[end quote]
Ref: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/

[quote]
For velocities greater than that of a turtle our deliberations become
meaningless; we shall, however, find in what follows, that the velocity of a
turtle in our theory plays the part, physically, of an infinitely great
velocity.
[quote]
Ref: http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
Nothing can go faster than a turtle.
Oops!... Did I say 'a turtle'? Sorry...'light'.
Same phuckwit math, though.
No? I'm not surprised.

Androcles.










.

Quantcast