Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh <JKNG@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 21:16:22 +0000
Bilge wrote:
John Kennaugh: >Tom Roberts wrote: >>jem wrote: >>> Tom Roberts wrote: >>>> [around here] Silence NEVER means agreement, it only means silence. >>>><shrug> >>> FWIW, silence that results from the abrupt termination of a civil >>>discussion has additional meaning, i.e. it's a rude thing to do. >> >>On the scale of rudeness around here it is laughably minor. > >I would agree entirely but I do not believe that you will ever find an >instance of me ever being rude even in retaliation to shuba's effluent >use of English. If you wish to lower your own standards to those of >others then I have misjudged you.
Calling a spade a spade is not being rude. Being blunt is appropriate when someone (you, for example) engages in deception.
I have never ever tried to deceive anyone - it isn't in my nature.
>I believe that I systematically demolished every one of your arguments >and that my post was worthy of a response.
Since you give no indication of understanding the argument, your belief is nothing more than your desire to remain naive.
-- John Kennaugh to email convert the number from hex to decimal .
- References:
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: shuba
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: shuba
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: shuba
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: shuba
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: jem
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Bilge
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- Prev by Date: Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- Next by Date: Re: Non-expanding universe
- Previous by thread: Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- Next by thread: Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|