Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration

Ken S. Tucker wrote:
mathexpert@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: 
[accelerated observer] Can we address this simple type
of problem
outside of the umbrella of GR?


Yes if you put square pegs in round holes.
But the answer is NO to your question, GR is required,
and was invented for that reason.

Nonsense. The references I gave all describe this perfectly well in SR, and are explicit counterexamples to your claim.


Tom Roberts	tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration
    ... Tom Roberts wrote: ... > Ken S. Tucker wrote: ... >>>outside of the umbrella of GR? ... > and are explicit counterexamples to your claim. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: On Talladega, two days after the fact
    ... The umbrella of "that's just racin'" was developed a long, ... some awfully great and talented and classy drivers for one reason ... ... chance to avoid an accident" rule. ...
    (rec.autos.sport.nascar)
  • Re: Lorentz Invariance
    ... > Ken S. Tucker: ... but s is not, therefore, I find reason ... shift geodesics by a quantum intrusion. ... the gases within the Combustion Chamber ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: On Talladega, two days after the fact
    ... The umbrella of "that's just racin'" was developed a long, ... some awfully great and talented and classy drivers for one reason ... ... I was really there with Junior and his equanimity after the race - ...
    (rec.autos.sport.nascar)
  • Re: On Talladega, two days after the fact
    ... The umbrella of "that's just racin'" was developed a long, ... some awfully great and talented and classy drivers for one reason ... ... I was really there with Junior and his equanimity after the race - ...
    (rec.autos.sport.nascar)
Loading