Re: Falling space
- From: "Henry Haapalainen" <kirppu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 01:32:33 +0200
"Dr Photon" <brendan.roycroft@xxxxxxx> kirjoitti viestissä
news:1132680735.937569.150920@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> HH wrote:
> >Dr Photon wrote:
> >> So how did you get aA=const without just arbitrarily setting it? I
> >> didn't see it in your article, so maybe you could copy-paste the
> >> relevant section, or explain it again here.
>
>
>
> >When space is falling it is accelerating like a falling ball. As such an
> >event seemed to be too complex to state as a mathematical equation, I had
to
> >find some easier way. I wrote that almost 25 years ago. If I remember
> >correctly, it was not hard to find. (HH)
>
> So you just arbitrarily set it to get the "right" result, then.
> However, you also wrote
>
> B1 "But an explanation can also be found as to why this is so. "
>
> without giving the explanation anywhere. What is the explanation? You
> can't say that it is due to space infalling into matter, as that gives
> a=1/r^5. Please give details.
>
> br
The explanation is, that the idea led to the Newton's equation of gravity.
Henry Haapalainen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Falling space
- From: Dr Photon
- Re: Falling space
- References:
- Re: Falling space
- From: Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Falling space
- From: Dr Photon
- Re: Falling space
- From: Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Falling space
- From: Dr Photon
- Re: Falling space
- From: Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Falling space
- From: Dr Photon
- Re: Falling space
- Prev by Date: Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness"
- Next by Date: Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!
- Previous by thread: Re: Falling space
- Next by thread: Re: Falling space
- Index(es):
Loading