Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"


Henri Wilson wrote:
> On 21 Nov 2005 17:51:45 -0800, "Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >
> >Henri Wilson wrote:
> >> On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 11:06:13 -0500, "Len Gaasenbeek" <gaasbeek@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> >"Henri Wilson" <HW@..> wrote in message
> >> >news:igesn1trlqid27eks20of610qvfvk2rh9n@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> >> On Fri, 18 Nov 2005 07:35:03 -0500, "Len Gaasenbeek" <gaasbeek@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> >.......................................................
> >> >
> >> >To Henri,
> >> >
> >> >All matter is completely transparent to gravitons since they are more
> >> >energetic than gamma rays. They do have momentum but will only affect other
> >> >gravitons, in that they tend to take the path of least resistance as far as
> >> >other gravitons are concerned. That is to say, according to 'the principle
> >> >of least resistance', gravitons travel down the gravitational field gradient
> >> >as they try and stay clear from each other.
> >> >
> >> >Another way of saying this is that, gravitons do not bunch up any more than
> >> >they have to, but strive for the most even distribution in space and matter
> >> >that is possible under any given set of conditions. If this were not the
> >> >case, what would cause them to bunch up in one location and not in another
> >> >which was equally situated?
> >> >
> >> >Finally, if gravitons did bunch up at a given location for no apparent
> >> >reason, physics would become an arbitrary and/or magic science, which it
> >> >isn't.
> >> >
> >> >To repeat, the only time a graviton exerts a momentary reactive force on
> >> >matter is at the instant a body emits a graviton. These combined impulses
> >> >cause the gravitational attraction between two adjacent bodies, because as
> >> >explained above, each body emits more gravitons away from the other body
> >> >than towards it.
> >> >
> >> >Len.
> >> >............................................
> >> >
> >>
> >> OK sorry. My view of a graviton is somewhat different.
> >>
> >> Mine are bouncing around everywhere in space, like a gas.
> >> They DO interact with matter, transferring momentum in the normal way.
> >>
> >> Any two chunks of matter mutually shield each other from gravitons coming from
> >> the direction of their connecting axis and thereabouts. Hence the two objects
> >> are drawn together.
> >> I once calculated that the attraction obeys the inverse square law.
> >>
> >> However both your and my theory of gravitons raise the same questions. What is
> >> their source? and, wrt planets like Earth, how do they penetrate evenly right
> >> through the whole mass?
> >
> >Like this:
> ><< In these cases, there is no cutoff distance and, more importantly,
> >each particle interacts with all the images of the other particles in
> >the
> >nearby MD boxes: the ``minimum image rule'' introduced in 2.2.1
> >breaks down. A particle would also interact with its own images.
> >A known method to deal with long-range forces is that of Ewald sums. >>
> >http://www.fisica.uniud.it/~ercolessi/md/md/node52.html
> >http://www.chem.purdue.edu/gchelp/liquids/inddip.html
> >http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22induced+dipole%22&btnG=Google+Search
>
> all totally irrelevant.
>
> >
> >
> >Sue...
> >
>
> I think you are out of your depth here.
More like real physics is over your head:
http://web.mit.edu/8.02t/www/802TEAL3D/teal_tour.htm

Sue...

>
>
> HW.
> www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm
> see: www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/variablestars.exe
>
> "Sometimes I feel like a complete failure.
> The most useful thing I have ever done is prove Einstein wrong".

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy"
    ... To Henri Wilson, ... "This is why a body will continue to emit gravitons at a constant rate even ... A particle would also interact with its own images. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Is the graviton its own anti-particle?
    ... So far the existence of gravitons is purely speculative. ... Photons are participants in electromagnetic interactions that are ... My personal opinion is that the 'graviton' was conceived by particle ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: What really is "Light" (assuming SR is correct)??
    ... Photons have spin one; gravitons spin 2. ... > of your face and because you don't understand the nature of charge then ... Your proof how a particle of spin one can act like a particle of spin 2 ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: What really is "Light" (assuming SR is correct)??
    ... Photons have spin one; gravitons spin 2. ... > of your face and because you don't understand the nature of charge then ... Your proof how a particle of spin one can act like a particle of spin 2 ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Newtons law and dark matter
    ... > The quantic Newton's law is given by emission of gravitons. ... > which go through a particle gives to this particle an acceleration equal ... > When the mass are near each particle of the mass receives all the ...
    (sci.astro)