Re: Shrug
- From: "Androcles" <Androcles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:31:18 GMT
<surrealistic-dream@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1132844305.577105.145210@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> Androcles wrote:
>> "Tom Roberts" <tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:r8Tgf.1812$Y%5.476@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > John Kennaugh wrote:
>> >> Tom Roberts wrote:
>> >>> I am not trying to "explain" source independence, Kennaugh was.
>> >>
>> >> The question was why did Einstein assume source independence when
>> >> formulating SR
>> >
>> > That is a silly question, and one that cannot possibly have a
>> > definitive
>> > answer. Do you intend to hold a seance?
>> >
>> > IMHO Einstein did what any sensible person would do in presenting a new
>> > approach to well-known physics:
>>
>> HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
>> Your opinion is as worthless as Einstein's, Roberts. <shrug>
>> Why the hell would anyone need a new approach to well-known physics?
>>
>> When asked if New York stops at this train, Galileo replied "Yes".
>>
>> Einstein said "As has already been shown to the first order
>> of small quantities (by Galileo, but the secret to creativity
>> is knowing how to hide your sources so we won't mention him)
>
> Reference for this paraphrase, please.
Certainly. <shrug>
"Take, for example, the reciprocal electrodynamic action of a magnet and a
conductor. The observable phenomenon here depends only on the relative
motion of the conductor and the magnet... ...Examples of this sort, together
with... ...as has already been shown to the first order of small
quantities ... ...will hereafter be called the ``Principle of Relativity''
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
Google for Einstein's trivial quotations ("secret to creativity is knowing
how to hide your sources") yourself. Einstein cited no papers in his 1905
paper, he wanted all the credit. <shrug>
Roberts's opinions are far from honest, he has hallucinations.< shrug>
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
From: Tom Roberts <tjrobe...@xxxxxxxxxx> - Find messages by this
author
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2005 17:57:18 GMT
Local: Sat, Sep 17 2005 6:57 pm
Subject: Re: Does the 'Curvature of Spacetime' cause gravity?
"Yes, tests of strong fields are few and far between, but there are
some:
the binary pulsars, and observations of accretion disks near black
holes -- Roberts has OBSERVED these accretion disks NEAR black holes.
<shrug>
He should be quite famous, having discovered the location of a black
hole.<shrug>
When he wants accuracy to suit his argument,
From: Tom Roberts <tjrobe...@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Nov 2005 12:56:28 -0600
"The PDG lists the muon lifetime as 2.19703 +- 0.00004 microseconds.
That's pretty accurate. BTW that's the mean lifetime, not the half-life."
Tom Roberts tjrobe...@xxxxxxxxxx <shrug>
When accuracy goes against his argument then it's
From: Tom Roberts <tjrobe...@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 17:13:12 GMT
"Amateurs look at data, professionals look at errorbars.
That page completely ignores the many modern measurements, which VASTLY
smaller errorbars, that all show the constancy of the speed of light in
many different situations."-- Tom Roberts tjrobe...@xxxxxxxxxx
Androcles <shrug>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Shrug
- From: surrealistic-dream
- Re: Shrug
- References:
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: shuba
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Harry
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: shuba
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: vern
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: John Kennaugh
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- From: Tom Roberts
- Shrug
- From: Androcles
- Re: Shrug
- From: surrealistic-dream
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- Prev by Date: Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- Next by Date: DTG: A New Theory of Gravity
- Previous by thread: Re: Shrug
- Next by thread: Re: Shrug
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|