Re: symmetrical and asymmetrical twins


"Sue..." <suzysewnshow@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1133122599.767450.223800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> beda pietanza wrote:
> > ***
> > Two twins are sent in opposite directions, at the same absolute
> > speed of .1 C, from a common launch pad, the launch pad is at
> > rest in the ether, after a absolute time, let us say, 1 year
> >
> > time rate of the clocks of both twins is:
> > 0,994987437106619954734479821001206
> > so after 1 year of travel each twin ages exactly the same:
> > 0,994987437106619954734479821001206 years.
> >
> > Perfectly symmetric.
> >
> >
> > ****
> >
> > In case the launch pad is going at .2 C, and, again, the two twins
> > are sent away at the speed of .1 C relatively to the launch pad,
> > the final speed of each twin is asymmetric:
> >
> > the twin going in the same direction of the launch pad is going at:
> > .25 C with a time rate of 0,9682458365518542212948163499456
> >
> > the twin going in the opposite direction of the launch pad is going at:
> > .125 C with a time rate of 0,992156741649221471438105907614723
> >
> > so after a year of travel (ether time) one twin will age:
> > 0,9682458365518542212948163499456 years
> > the other will age:
> > 0,992156741649221471438105907614723 years
> >
> > so they are aging asymmetrically,
> > regardless of any reference but the ether alone.
> >
> > Referred to the lunch pad, the launch pad has a time rate of
> > 0,979795897113271239278913629882357
> >
> > the aging rate of the first twin versus the launch pad is:
> > 0,96824583../ 0,979795897..= 0,988211768802618541249654232634612
> > the aging rate of the second twin versus the launch pad is:
> > 0,99215674.../ 0,979795897..= 1,01261573412622816108843241188801
> >
> > so their aging rate is asymmetrical, also, versus the launch pad
> >
> > there is nothing more to the twins story.
> >
> > To a linear thread nothing can happen so easily than to get garbled; is not
> > that easy to get it straight again.
> >
> > best regards
> >
> > beda pietanza
>
> Asymeterical ?
> Which twin reports the most orbits of Jupiters moons?
>
> Sue...

You can't help it, can you?
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=dennis+mccarthy+jupiter+moons

Dirk Vdm


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: symmetrical and asymmetrical twins
    ... > Two twins are sent in opposite directions, ... > speed of .1 C, from a common launch pad, the launch pad is at ... > so after 1 year of travel each twin ages exactly the same: ... > .25 C with a time rate of 0,9682458365518542212948163499456 ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • symmetrical and asymmetrical twins
    ... Two twins are sent in opposite directions, ... speed of .1 C, from a common launch pad, the launch pad is at ... so after 1 year of travel each twin ages exactly the same: ... C with a time rate of 0,9682458365518542212948163499456 ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: symmetrical and asymmetrical twins
    ... > Two twins are sent in opposite directions, ... > speed of .1 C, from a common launch pad, the launch pad is at ... > so after 1 year of travel each twin ages exactly the same: ... > .25 C with a time rate of 0,9682458365518542212948163499456 ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)