Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
- From: Tom Roberts <tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 10:37:52 -0600
Joe Fischer wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 05:27:50 GMT, Tom Roberts <tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Joe Fischer wrote:On Mon, 28 Nov 2005 15:27:16 -0600, Tom Roberts <tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Then you need to define what you mean by "additive".Hmmm. In GR, gravitation is not "additive", if by that term you really mean linear.No, I don't mean linear, I mean additive, [...]
http://www.faqs.org/faqs/astronomy/faq/part4/section-5.html
The only appearance of "additive" on that page is used in the sense of "linear".
Tom Roberts tjroberts@xxxxxxxxxx .
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
- From: Koobee Wublee
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
- From: Joe Fischer
- I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
- Prev by Date: Re: Einstein, the father of this group
- Next by Date: Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
- Previous by thread: Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
- Next by thread: Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct
- Index(es):