sci.physics.relativity
- Rule of The Arcana,
Ben Bean
- relativity? paradox?,
Ulala
- Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Experiment?,
Joe Fischer
- Approximating the Universe,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Is the black hole's spin holding it up?,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- anybody wants to read something in german?,
Thomas Heger
- on bending of space time,
fuzzlogic
- Re: Feynman's Rainbow & String Theory,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Infinity a Concept,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Celebrating and Mourning in Einstein's Cult,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Give up Black Holes,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Is this Right, which object or both has the attribute gravitational mass?,
Joe Fischer
- What does "VIRGO" stand for?,
Ian Shea
- symmetrical and asymmetrical twins,
beda pietanza
- "The Impossibility of Measuring the Velocity of Light",
Tsom
- Einstein, the father of this group,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Einstein, the father of this group,
Aetherist
- Re: Einstein, the father of this group,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Einstein, the father of this group,
looter
- Re: Einstein, the father of this group,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Einstein, the father of this group,
surrealistic-dream@hotmai
- Re: Einstein, the father of this group,
Juan R.
- Re: Einstein, the father of this group,
oriel36
- doin physics,
Neil G
- G the gravitational constant,
BernardZ
- Trying to Understand Relativity,
djlockdown@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Trying to Understand Relativity,
bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
Re: Trying to Understand Relativity,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Message not available
- Message not available
I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Joe Fischer
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Joe Fischer
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Joe Fischer
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Neil G
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Tom Roberts
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Androcles
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Joe Fischer
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Koobee Wublee
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Joe Fischer
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Tom Roberts
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Joe Fischer
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Tom Roberts
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Joe Fischer
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Tom Roberts
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
stephen
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Joe Fischer
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
brian a m stuckless
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Androcles
- Re: I Believe That General Relativity Accurately Describes Nature and that the results given by the math are essentially correct,
Bill Hobba
Make Al Say Your Theory, Albert Einstein Generator,
homeless . panhandler
Re: Unification question,
main_engineering
"The Brilliance of Our Teachers",
Tsom
a childish game,
beda pietanza
Re: Biological Evolution vs. Theological Creation,
main_engineering
Re: Save your world,
Androcles
Relativity Basics: Bias, Bias, who's got the bias,
Joe Fischer
Re: Velocity vector Magnitude & Direction, v.,
Joe Fischer
"The Right Angle Lever Paradox",
Tsom
Re: Some Troubling Assumptions of SRT,
Sue...
"How Does Light "Know" How Fast to Travel?",
Tleb
DTG: A New Theory of Gravity,
kenseto
Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light,
Joe Fischer
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Black Holes, Gravity, and the Speed of light,
G=EMC^2 Glazier
again space again new space,
resneli
Androcle is right, N:dlzc D:aol T:com (dlzc) is a stupid nazi parrot,
Tex VG
"The Paradox of Zeno",
Tleb
Re: Blasts froim the past.,
Daniel Weston
Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
TomGee
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Andreas Most
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
TomGee
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Andreas Most
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
PD
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Andreas Most
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
TomGee
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Andreas Most
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
TomGee
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
PD
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Andreas Most
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
TomGee
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Andreas Most
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
TomGee
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Dr Photon
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: A Look at Quantum "Spookiness",
Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
Synthetic Telepathy, Tachyons, and NDE's,
Raktizer Omheit
The Eternal Triangle:- Politics, Science and Religion.,
Arthur Knight
Re: Did I miss this, "Einstein paper published in 2005",
John Kennaugh
"The Gravity Transformations and the Creation of a Universe",
Tleb
Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Joe Fischer
- Message not available
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Androcles
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Androcles
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Androcles
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Gravity -- Fundamental Force or Space-Time Geometry?,
Joe Fischer
At least one thing dumber then ether,
Joe Fischer
Re: speed limits for macroscopic bodies,
Lynx Xiong
Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
mathexpert
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Sue...
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
significant zero
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Androcles
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Sue...
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Ken S. Tucker
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
Symmetry Observer
- Re: Simple Question About GR And Uniform Acceleration,
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Stripping away the bull shit,
significant zero
Light Speed refutes Special Relativity, Translation,
Stan Byers
Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity, Translation,
Thomas Heger
Re: Light Speed refutes Special Relativity, Translation,
oriel36
Re: MOving Dimensions Theory: Time is not a dimension, but an emerg...,
Daniel Weston
isik hizina ulasan madde ne olur?,
resneli
Spookfeed's movie.,
Androcles
"Where Is The Kinetic Energy of a Bullet Stored?",
Woleb
Retarded potential and funny clocks,
Sue...
"A Snapshot of a Photon",
Woleb
Annus Mirabilis Papers (from Annus mirabilis, Latin for 'year of wonders'),
Joe Fischer
Re: Visualizing curved space-time objectively & locally,
em
Welcome to sci.physics.relativity,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
Re: Testing,
John Zinni
Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy",
Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy",
pinky38
Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy",
C.A.M
Re: "The Source of Gravitational Energy",
zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
meridians as geodesics,
Igor Lukacevic
Spinning black holes and dragging of space,
Anonymous
Q-basic program for the at theory.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.,
Black Knight
- Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.,
Black Knight
- Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.,
Black Knight
- Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.,
Black Knight
- Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.,
Androcles
- Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.,
Gerald L. O'Barr
- Re: Q-basic program for the at theory.,
Ilja Schmelzer
Falling space,
Henry Haapalainen
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Falling space,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Falling space,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Falling space,
Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
- Re: Falling space,
Dr Photon
- Re: Falling space,
Dr Photon
- Re: Falling space,
Dr Photon
- Re: Falling space,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Falling space,
M D Meenken
- Re: Falling space,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Falling space,
Dr Photon
- Re: Falling space,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Falling space,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Falling space,
Dr Photon
- Re: Falling space,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Falling space,
Dr Photon
- Re: Falling space,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Falling space,
Dr Photon
- Re: Falling space,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Falling space,
Dr Photon
- Re: Falling space,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: Falling space,
Bilge
"The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics",
Retic
Re: GR-c goes "instantaneously" from 0 to c ..in NO time.!! But jOE, Tom Roberts says LiGHT "STOPs slowing down".!! [ Does SPEED c "STOP slowing down" instantaneously.? ] [ Does VELOCiTY c "STOP slowing down" ..automatically.? ] Does LiGHT "STOP slowing down" instantaneously automatically.?!! What is "simultaneity" for TWO different POiNTs on a TiME-line.?,
Joe Fischer
Unified Physics and New Blackhole >> IQ in Australia,
relativitybeyondeinstein
Lorentzian grainy space,
pekka . virtanen
The planet orbiting Algol.,
Black Knight
Re: The planet orbiting Algol.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: The planet orbiting Algol.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: The planet orbiting Algol.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: The planet orbiting Algol.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: The planet orbiting Algol.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: The planet orbiting Algol.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: The planet orbiting Algol.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: The planet orbiting Algol.,
Androcles
Re: The planet orbiting Algol.,
Androcles
Re: The planet orbiting Algol.,
Black Knight
Re: wrong light,
Bill Hobba
Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Spoonfed
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Spoonfed
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Spoonfed
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Spoonfed
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Spoonfed
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Spoonfed
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Spoonfed
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Bill Hobba
- Message not available
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Bilge
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Bill Hobba
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Sue...
- Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Black Knight
Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Sue...
Re: Too many Possums in the sack? More questions/speculation about Magnetism,
Sue...
Re: Non-expanding universe,
dwhig265
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Dr Nanduri
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Spoonfed
- Message not available
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Spoonfed
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Black Knight
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Spoonfed
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Black Knight
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Spoonfed
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Black Knight
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Spoonfed
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Spoonfed
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Black Knight
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Black Knight
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Spoonfed
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Black Knight
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Spoonfed
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Black Knight
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Spoonfed
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Black Knight
- Message not available
Re: Non-expanding universe,
ratcliff
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
ratcliff
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
ratcliff
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
dwhig265
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
ratcliff
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
dwhig265
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
ratcliff
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
dwhig265
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
ratcliff
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
mluttgens
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
ratcliff
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
kenseto
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
ratcliff
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
kenseto
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
ratcliff
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Daniel Weston
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
ratcliff
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
mluttgens
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
ratcliff
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
mluttgens
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
ratcliff
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
mluttgens
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
ratcliff
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
mluttgens
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
Ilja Schmelzer
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
ratcliff
- Re: Non-expanding universe,
ratcliff
Re: Non-expanding universe,
kenseto
Re: Non-expanding universe,
rehamkcirtap@xxxxxxxxx
I caught a bottle of photons,
Sue...
Re: spr is defunct.(KST)=> better physics.,
Sue...
Re: a new reward,
Bill Hobba
Re: a new reward,
Black Knight
Message not available
Re: a new reward,
Eric Gisse
Re: a new reward,
Bilge
Re: a new reward,
Bilge
Re: a new reward,
Henry Haapalainen
Re: a new reward,
Henry Haapalainen
Re: a new reward,
Henry Haapalainen
Re: a new reward,
Henry Haapalainen
Re: a new reward,
Thomas Heger
- Re: a new reward,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: a new reward,
Thomas Heger
- Re: a new reward,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: a new reward,
Thomas Heger
- Re: a new reward,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: a new reward,
Thomas Heger
- Re: a new reward,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: a new reward,
Thomas Heger
- Re: a new reward,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: a new reward,
Thomas Heger
- Re: a new reward,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: a new reward,
Eric Gisse
- Re: a new reward,
Thomas Heger
- Re: a new reward,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: a new reward,
Henry Haapalainen
- Re: a new reward,
Eric Gisse
Re: extra dimenssion,
Bill Hobba
Message not available
Message not available
Re: non-relativistic,
Eric Gisse
Re: Singularities: What Hawking needed to say,
Tom Roberts
Re: "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems",
surrealistic-dream
Re: Truce called with Androcles.,
Eric Gisse
Albert's aberation about time and lack of basics absolutes,
Arthur Knight
Re: The simple truth about TIME and other absolutes,
M D Meenken
Re: The simple truth about TIME and other absolutes,
AllYou!
How simple "verified." Here I am again to help you. Don't say it.,
Arthur Knight
Confusion of the PoE,
Joe Fischer
Did Einstein say this,
Joe Fischer
The Principle of Equivalence,
Joe Fischer
What really excited Einstein,
Joe Fischer
Are relativists some kind of sect? Mathematical funambulism, systems of units, and Newtonian limit,
Juan R.
- Re: Are relativists some kind of sect? Mathematical funambulism, systems of units, and Newtonian limit,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Are relativists some kind of sect? Mathematical funambulism, systems of units, and Newtonian limit,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Are relativists some kind of sect? Mathematical funambulism, systems of units, and Newtonian limit,
Eric Gisse
- Re: Are relativists some kind of sect? Mathematical funambulism, systems of units, and Newtonian limit,
Juan R.
Re: Eotvos.,
FrediFizzx
- Re: Eotvos.,
Black Knight
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Eotvos.,
brian a m stuckless
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
Androcles
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Message not available
- Re: Eotvos.,
Androcles
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
Androcles
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
- Re: Eotvos.,
Bilge
- Re: Eotvos.,
em
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
Message not availableRe: Eotvos.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
Re: Eotvos.,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: How To Disprove c'=c+v With A Pen Laser,
Sue...
Re: Ground ... Absolue Reference Frame ?,
Joe Fischer
Simultaneity,
Sue...
Re: Many writers fail to emphasis important facts about gravity theory,
Bill Hobba
Re: Many writers fail to emphasis important facts about gravity theory,
Ilja Schmelzer
Message not available
Re: Do these questions about Maxwell's Equations make sense?,
Bill Hobba
Re: The End of Zombie Science,
Paul B. Andersen
- Message not available
- Re: The End of Zombie Science,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The End of Zombie Science,
Black Knight
- Message not available
- Re: The End of Zombie Science,
Black Knight
- Re: The End of Zombie Science,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The End of Zombie Science,
Black Knight
- Re: The End of Zombie Science,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The End of Zombie Science,
Black Knight
- Re: The End of Zombie Science,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The End of Zombie Science,
Black Knight
- Re: The End of Zombie Science,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: The End of Zombie Science,
Androcles
SR and rates,
dseppala
Message not available
Re: SR and rates,
Sue...
Re: The simple truth,
Bill Hobba
The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Harry
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
surrealistic-dream
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
surrealistic-dream
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
surrealistic-dream
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
kenseto
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Harry
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
surrealistic-dream
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Harry
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
surrealistic-dream
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Harry
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
PD
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
PD
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Lynx Xiong
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
PD
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Androcles
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
PD
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
PD
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
PD
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Androcles
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Message not availableRe: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
FrediFizzx
Message not availableRe: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
FrediFizzx
Message not availableRe: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Harry
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
shuba
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Harry
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Androcles
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Harry
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Androcles
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Harry
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Harry
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Harry
Message not availableRe: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Harry
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
jem
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Harry
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
jem
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Harry
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
jem
Message not availableRe: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Harry
Message not availableRe: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Harry
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
surrealistic-dream
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Harry
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
surrealistic-dream
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
surrealistic-dream
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
surrealistic-dream
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
surrealistic-dream
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
surrealistic-dream
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
surrealistic-dream
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
surrealistic-dream
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Harry
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Bilge
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Message not availableRe: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
surrealistic-dream
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
kenseto
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
harry
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
surrealistic-dream
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Black Knight
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
PD
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Black Knight
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
PD
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Black Knight
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
surrealistic-dream
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Black Knight
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
cadwgan_gedrych
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Black Knight
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
cadwgan_gedrych
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Black Knight
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
cadwgan_gedrych
Message not available
Message not available
Message not available
Message not availableRe: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
stephen
Re: The physical motions of photons in free space!,
Gerald L. O'Barr
Re: Forum for relativity science without the nutters?,
Dirk Van de moortel
David McAnally - please help with limits and infinities,
dseppala
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Joe Fischer
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Tom Roberts
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Joe Fischer
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Tom Roberts
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Androcles
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Dirk Van de moortel
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Joe Fischer
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
TomGee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Joe Fischer
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
TomGee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
PD
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Tom Roberts
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
TomGee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
jem
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Tom Roberts
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Tom Roberts
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
TomGee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Tom Roberts
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
TomGee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Tom Roberts
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
TomGee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Tom Roberts
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Tom Roberts
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Bilge
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Bilge
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Bilge
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Bilge
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Tom Roberts
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Tom Roberts
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Bilge
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Bilge
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Tom Roberts
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Bilge
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Tom Roberts
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Tom Roberts
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Koobee Wublee
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Mike
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Bilge
Re: Expansion and balloon analogy,
Ilja Schmelzer
absolute and relative launch pad,
beda pietanza
- Re: absolute and relative launch pad,
ande452
- Message not available
- Re: absolute and relative launch pad,
Randy Poe
- Re: absolute and relative launch pad,
Androcles
- Re: absolute and relative launch pad,
Randy Poe
- Re: absolute and relative launch pad,
Randy Poe
- Re: absolute and relative launch pad,
Androcles
- Re: absolute and relative launch pad,
Joe Fischer
- Re: absolute and relative launch pad,
Randy Poe
- Lying Blind Pew.,
Black Knight
- Re: absolute and relative launch pad,
Androcles
- Re: absolute and relative launch pad,
Randy Poe
- Message not available
- Re: absolute and relative launch pad,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: absolute and relative launch pad,
Randy Poe
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: absolute and relative launch pad,
Eric Gisse
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: absolute and relative launch pad,
Randy Poe
- Re: absolute and relative launch pad,
Black Knight
Re: absolute and relative launch pad,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: absolute and relative launch pad,
kenseto
Message not available
Message not available
quantum physics also wrong,
looter
Re: Requiem for the Theory of Relativity,
snapdragon31
Re: Anyone ever read this Einstein physics book?,
John Kennaugh
Message not available
Message not available
Message not available
Message not available
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: Anyone ever read this Einstein physics book?,
bz
Message not availableRe: Anyone ever read this Einstein physics book?,
bz
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Sue...
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Androcles
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Tice with a J
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Eric Gisse
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Harry
Message not available
Message not available
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
kenseto
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Eric Gisse
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Black Knight
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Eric Gisse
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Sue...
Message not availableRe: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Sue...
Message not availableRe: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Sue...
Message not availableRe: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Black Knight
Message not availableRe: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Sue...
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Sue...
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
brian a m stuckless
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Sue...
Re: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: SR's FLAW in a NUTSHELL.,
Eric Gisse
Re: johnreed take 1B --- 2005,
randamajor
Re: The End of Zombie Science III,
shuba
Re: Black holes radiate - the end of GR is there,
Autymn D. C.
Question about Light from the Big Bang,
Brian Weatherley
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
Sue...
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
Androcles
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
Sue...
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
Brian.Weatherley@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
Androcles
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
Androcles
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
Androcles
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
Androcles
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
Androcles
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
Androcles
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
Androcles
- Re: Question about Light from the Big Bang,
rotchm@xxxxxxxxx
Re: Electron at rest - magnetic field?,
Autymn D. C.
Re: How do atom bound electrons know which frequency to absorb? Letting in light?,
Joe Fischer
Attraction VS geometry,
Joe Fischer
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Sue...
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Tom Roberts
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
surrealistic-dream
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Sue...
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Joe Fischer
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Sue...
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
jem
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Black Knight
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
jem
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Black Knight
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
jem
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Black Knight
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
jem
- Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Black Knight
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: Attraction VS geometry,
Black Knight
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: Attraction VS geometry,
Tom Roberts
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
surrealistic-dream
Message not availableRe: Attraction VS geometry,
Tom Roberts
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
joe_avery_2005
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
jem
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Tom Roberts
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Black Knight
Message not availableRe: Attraction VS geometry,
ande452
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Black Knight
Message not availableRe: Attraction VS geometry,
Bilge
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Bilge
Message not availableRe: Attraction VS geometry,
Black Knight
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: Attraction VS geometry,
jem
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Bilge
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
joe_avery_2005
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Joe Fischer
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Henry Haapalainen
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Joe Fischer
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Tom Roberts
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: Attraction VS geometry,
Black Knight
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Black Knight
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
The Ghost In The Machine
Message not availableRe: Attraction VS geometry,
Black Knight
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: Attraction VS geometry,
Black Knight
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Black Knight
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: Attraction VS geometry,
Bilge
Re: Attraction VS geometry,
Androcles
Re: johnreed take 1B --- 2005,
Bill Hobba
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: johnreed take 1B --- 2005,
Androcles
What was I thinking? (tensor question),
dgoldsmith_89
Re: On the LaserLune Data,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
Re-aligning astronomical principles,
oriel36
SR and time machine,
newsrudy
Can induced dipole forces be modeld in QM ?,
Sue...
The absolute aging of the twins,
beda pietanza
Re: The absolute aging of the twins,
King Coffee
Re: The absolute aging of the twins,
beda pietanza
Re: The absolute aging of the twins,
Helmut Wabnig
proof that we go back in time,
mazafaka
Re: how to understand a tensor,
mazafaka
Re: Criminal Science,
Henry Haapalainen
Re: Falling in curves,
Joe Fischer
This is for Kepler,
oriel36
Re: Open for Guppy bait.,
Bilge
Re: SR & probability problem - please explain,
dseppala
Re: SR & probability problem - please explain,
ande452
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: SR & probability problem - please explain,
dseppala
Re: SR & probability problem - please explain,
Androcles
Re: SR & probability problem - please explain,
Sue...
Re: SR & probability problem - please explain,
xxein
About Array of Time in H-M's Black Holes,
h.poropudas@xxxxxxxxxx
Re: Demolition job needed on this theory of the cosmos - any volunteers?,
maestro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Re: What does acceleration do to inertia?,
Joe Fischer
RE: Direct TWLS Measurement,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
Message not availableRe: Direct TWLS Measurement,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
Message not availableRe: Direct TWLS Measurement,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
xxein
Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
bz
Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
Message not available
Message not available
Message not available
Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
PD
- Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
Dirk Van de moortel
- Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
Rod Ryker
- Message not available
- Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
PD
- Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
PD
- Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
Androcles
- Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
PD
- Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
Androcles
- Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
Rod Ryker
- Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
looty
Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
shevek
Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
jem
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
Androcles
Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
Sue...
Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
Daniel Weston
Re: Direct TWLS Measurement,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: Maxwell & GR (kst),
Ken S. Tucker
Re: force,
significant zero
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: force,
significant zero
Re: force,
significant zero
- Message not available
- Re: force,
significant zero
- Re: force,
Sue...
- Re: force,
significant zero
- Re: force,
Sue...
- Message not available
- Re: force,
Sue...
- Re: force,
significant zero
- Re: force,
Sue...
- Re: force,
significant zero
- Re: force,
Sue...
- Re: force,
significant zero
- Re: force,
Sue...
- Message not available
- Re: force,
Sue...
- Re: force,
significant zero
- Re: force,
Sue...
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: force,
significant zero
- Re: force,
Sue...
- Re: force,
Sue...
- Re: force,
significant zero
- Re: force,
Sue...
Re: force,
significant zero
Re: force,
shevek
Expansion Question,
unifieur@xxxxxxxxxxx
Measure gravity at short distances?,
Louise Johnson
377 ohms ?,
Sue...
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
Sue...
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
Sue...
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
Bill Hobba
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
Paul Stowe
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
Paul Stowe
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
Paul Stowe
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
Joe Fischer
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
mazafaka
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
Joe Fischer
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
mazafaka
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
FrediFizzx
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
Paul Stowe
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
FrediFizzx
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
Tom Roberts
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
Sue...
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
Paul Stowe
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
mazafaka
- Re: 377 ohms ?,
Androcles
Re: Relativity, an eather theory?,
Bill Hobba
Re: Relativity, an eather theory?,
Peter
Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
kk
Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
Harry
Message not available
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
kk
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
PD
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
Tom Roberts
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
The Ghost In The Machine
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
kk
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
PD
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
kk
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
PD
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
kk
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
- Message not available
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
kk
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
bz
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
kk
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
bz
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
kk
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
bz
- Message not available
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
bz
- Message not available
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
kk
- Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-By How Much Are They Out of Sync.,
shevek
absolute time and the etheristic SR Doppler,
beda pietanza
Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
AllYou!
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
AllYou!
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
AllYou!
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
AllYou!
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
AllYou!
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
AllYou!
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
- Message not available
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
AllYou!
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
AllYou!
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
surrealistic-dream
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
AllYou!
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
AllYou!
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
AllYou!
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
AllYou!
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
- Message not available
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
AllYou!
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
AllYou!
- Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
surrealistic-dream
- Message not available
- Re: Is AllYou Patrick Reany in Drag???,
AllYou!
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
surrealistic-dream
Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
surrealistic-dream
Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
surrealistic-dream
Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
Robert J. Kolker
Re: Incommensurability of Mathematical Logic and Scientific Logic,
jem
Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.,
PD
Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
Re: OWLS & Out of Sync Clocks-& By _How Much_ Are They Out of Sync.,
kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
Re: Why is the speed of light the same for all observers? (Inertial...,
Androcles
Re: How do you Interpret the Lorentz transform,
King Coffee
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: How do you Interpret the Lorentz transform,
Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
Re: Working Wrong Concepts,
xxein
Re: Working Wrong Concepts,
AllYou!
Re: "The Nature of Mass",
Joe Fischer
Re: Ballistic Theory, Progress report...Suitable for 5yo Kids,
Paul B. Andersen
- Message not available
- Message not available
Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Androcles
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Androcles
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Eric Gisse
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Androcles
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Androcles
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Paul B. Andersen
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Androcles
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Paul B. Andersen
- Message not available
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Paul B. Andersen
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Eric Gisse
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Jerry
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not available
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Androcles
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Androcles
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
bz
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
bz
Message not availableRe: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Androcles
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableRe: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Paul B. Andersen
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Black Knight
Message not availableRe: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Androcles
Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
The Ghost In The Machine
Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Androcles
Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Eric Gisse
Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Paul B. Andersen
Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Sue...
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
Eric Gisse
Re: GPS 'GR Correction' Myth.,
bz
Re: On the Energy of "Superluminal" muons,
PD
Re: a question about conservation and photons,
bz
Re: a question about conservation and photons,
bz
Re: a question about conservation and photons,
bz
Re: a question about conservation and photons,
Bilge
Re: a question about conservation and photons,
Bilge
Re: A Possible Mechanism For Gravity Without Forces Acting at a Distance,
stephen
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Martin Hogbin
<Possible follow-ups>
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
PD
- Message not available
- Message not available
Message not available
Message not available
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Message not availableMessage not availableMessage not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Sue...
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shuba
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shuba
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shuba
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shuba
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shuba
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shuba
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
bz
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
bz
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
vern
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
vern
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Shrug,
Androcles
Re: Shrug,
surrealistic-dream
Re: Shrug,
Androcles
Re: Shrug,
surrealistic-dream
Re: Shrug,
Androcles
Re: Shrug,
Sue...
Message not availableRe: Shrug,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Sue...
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Sue...
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Dirk Van de moortel
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Aetherist
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
oriel36
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shuba
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
shuba
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Sue...
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shevek
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shevek
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shevek
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
surrealistic-dream
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Joe Fischer
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shuba
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Jim Heckman
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shuba
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
jem
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shevek
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
vern
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shevek
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shuba
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Black Knight
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
oriel36
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Black Knight
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
surrealistic-dream
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Ilja Schmelzer
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Androcles
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shuba
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Sue...
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Sue...
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Sue...
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Black Knight
Message not availableMessage not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
Tom Roberts
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Black Knight
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Message not availableRe: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shuba
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
AllYou!
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Henry Haapalainen
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Mike
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
surrealistic-dream
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
oriel36
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bill Hobba
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Harry
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
vern
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
Bilge
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
John Kennaugh
Re: A little challenge for relativists.,
shevek
Re: Time dilatation and a space referential,
Bilge
Re: Time dilatation and a space referential,
PD
Re: Time dilatation and a space referential,
CFran
Re: Time dilatation and a space referential,
CFran
Re: The true crackpots,
mluttgens
