sci.physics.relativity

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Latter Day MMX
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Found the answer for my need of Brain Juice question!
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Found the answer for my need of Brain Juice question!
  • From: guskz
• Re: I need someone's brain juice here?
  • From: guskz
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Sue...
• Re: I need someone's brain juice here?
  • From: guskz
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• "The Observational Collapse of Einsteinian Physics"
  • From: Skrow
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Gravitational Radiation from the source
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Latter Day MMX
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Gravitational Radiation from the source
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Latter Day MMX
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Latter Day MMX
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Latter Day MMX
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: I need someone's brain juice here?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: I need someone's brain juice here?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: I need someone's brain juice here?
  • From: guskz
• Re: I need someone's brain juice here?
  • From: guskz
• Re: Nikola Tesla about Relativity
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: The Lorentz factor does not apply to the photon!!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: skearney
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: shuba
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: skearney
• Re: Understanding the Lorentz transformations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: skearney
• Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: Sue...
• Re: I need someone's brain juice here?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: I need someone's brain juice here?
  • From: guskz
• Re: I need someone's brain juice here?
  • From: guskz
• Re: Gravitational Radiation from the source
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: skearney
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Understanding the Lorentz transformations
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Understanding the Lorentz transformations
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Gravitational Radiation from the source
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: I need someone's brain juice here?
  • From: PD
• Re: I need someone's brain juice here?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: PD
• Re: I need someone's brain juice here?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: I need someone's brain juice here?
  • From: guskz
• Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: I need someone's brain juice here?
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Sue...
• I need someone's brain juice here?
  • From: guskz
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: PD
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Bilge
• Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: GSS
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Gravitational Radiation from the source
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Time Flow in Different Gravity Potentials.
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Understanding the Lorentz transformations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Understanding the Lorentz transformations
  • From: PD
• Re: Understanding the Lorentz transformations
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Time Flow in Different Gravity Potentials.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: jem
• Re: Time Flow in Different Gravity Potentials.
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Time Flow in Different Gravity Potentials.
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: 2006 -- THE YEAR OF MOVING DIMENSIONS THEORY : STRING THEORY
  • From: Bart Chappell
• Re: Time Flow in Different Gravity Potentials.
  • From: kenseto
• "Will the LIGO Experiment Work?"
  • From: Skrow
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: PD
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: errata corrige
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Latter Day MMX
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Understanding the Lorentz transformations
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Understanding the Lorentz transformations
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Time Flow in Different Gravity Potentials.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Time Flow in Different Gravity Potentials.
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: errata corrige
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Three Ring Circus
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Understanding the Lorentz transformations
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Sue...
• The Lorentz factor does not apply to the photon!!
  • From: Y.Porat
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Time Flow in Different Gravity Potentials.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Eotvos units - pretty pictures
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Eotvos units - pretty pictures
  • From: stephen
• Three Ring Circus
  • From: skearney
• Re: Both ways at once?
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: speed of light versus c, again
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Rudi Menter
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Eotvos units - pretty pictures
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Rudi Menter
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Understanding the Lorentz transformations
  • From: Rudi Menter
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Understanding the Lorentz transformations
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Rudi Menter
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Bilge
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Understanding the Lorentz transformations
  • From: Rudi Menter
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Rudi Menter
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Understanding the Lorentz transformations
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Latter Day MMX
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Understanding the Lorentz transformations
  • From: Rudi Menter
• Understanding the Lorentz transformations
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Rudi Menter
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: PD
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: PD
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Paul B. Andersen
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: JanPB
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Ken Tucker, meet Robert Brown ...
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Jerry
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Time dilation etc.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: PD
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: stephen
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: GSS
• Re: speed of light versus c, again
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Time dilation etc.
  • From: PD
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: errata corrige
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Mike
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Mike
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Der alte Hexenmeister
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Sue...
• "The Einstein Hoax"
  • From: Skrow
• Re: Time dilation etc.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: PD
• Re: Time dilation etc.
  • From: PD
• Re: speed of light versus c, again
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: speed of light versus c, again
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Time dilation etc.
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Time dilation etc.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: On the Theory and Physics of the Aether
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: errata corrige
  • From: Bilge
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Bilge
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Jem
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Jem
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: LameDuck
• Re: Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Sue...
• Explain the Law of conservation of matter and energy
  • From: Drifta12
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: speed of light versus c, again
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: jem
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Time dilation etc.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: stephen
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: speed of light versus c, again
  • From: argon
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: argon
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: PD
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: PD
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: speed of light versus c, again
  • From: PD
• Re: speed of light versus c, again
  • From: argon
• Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: speed of light versus c, again
  • From: argon
• Re: The Postulates of IRT (Improved Relativity Theory)
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: speed of light versus c, again
  • From: PD
• Re: speed of light versus c, again
  • From: argon
• Re: speed of light versus c, again
  • From: PD
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: stephen
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Sue...
• speed of light versus c, again
  • From: argon
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: argon
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: argon
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: argon
• Re: Time dilation etc.
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Mike
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: PD
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: stephen
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Mike
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Ken S. Tucker
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: stephen
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• "The Making of Observations in Relativistic Systems"
  • From: Skrow
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: stephen
• Re: Time dilation etc.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: Mike
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: PD
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: stephen
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: stephen
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: PD
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: GSS
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: PD
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: PD
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: PD
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: On the Theory and Physics of the Aether
  • From: shuba
• Re: errata corrige
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Bilge
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: On the Theory and Physics of the Aether
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: stephen
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: stephen
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: stephen
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: jem
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: jem
• Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: stephen
• Re: Invalidity of Special Theory of Relativity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: Latter Day MMX - discussion of LIGO
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: artificial sweetner
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: shuba
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: Eric Gisse
• consider this
  • From: artificial sweetner
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Bill Hobba
• new theory
  • From: artificial sweetner
• intelligent created gravitons
  • From: artificial sweetner
• Re: Latter Day MMX
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: jf34i
• Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Peter Kinane
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Latter Day MMX
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: PD
• Re: Twin Paradox Question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: PD
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Twin Paradox Question
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: jem
• Re: Twin Paradox Question
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Twin Paradox Question
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: Bilge
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: PD
• Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: GSS
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Latter Day MMX
  • From: kenseto
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: Rudi Menter
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: PD
• "Can the Second Law of Thermodynamics Be Circumvented?"
  • From: Egap
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: PD
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Latter Day MMX
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: gravity experiments, accuracy and what they test
  • From: glucose
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: glucose
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: glucose
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Mike
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: Mike
• Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Both ways at once?
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Bilge
• take a break!
  • From: spike
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Sue...
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Dastardly Fiend
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Jem
• Re: gravity experiments, accuracy and what they test
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Jem
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Jem
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Jem
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Jem
• Re: A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Martin Hogbin
• Re: O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!
  • From: Androcles
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Aetherist
• A mechanical way to obtain source independence re SOL
  • From: Daniel Weston
• Re: gravity experiments, accuracy and what they test
  • From: gentile
• O'Barr: SR is a weak theory, it is only math!
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: Mike
• Re: Why relativists are trolls.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• "The Scarcity of Life Bearing Planets"
  • From: Skrow
• Re: Why relativists are trolls.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: gravity experiments, accuracy and what they test
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Why relativists are trolls.
  • From: Mike
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: kenseto
• Re: gravity experiments, accuracy and what they test
  • From: NaCl
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: kenseto
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Why relativists are trolls.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: ?? ????? ?? ???? ???????? ?????? ?? ???? ????? ?????????
  • From: Androcles
• يا جماعة فى منـح تعليميـة مجانية فى مجال برمجة الكمبيوتر
  • From: Dr_mohamed_hassan_104
• يا جماعة فى منـح تعليميـة مجانية فى مجال برمجة الكمبيوتر
  • From: Dr_mohamed_hassan_104
• يا جماعة فى منـح تعليميـة مجانية فى مجال برمجة الكمبيوتر
  • From: Dr_mohamed_hassan_104
• يا جماعة فى منـح تعليميـة مجانية فى مجال برمجة الكمبيوتر
  • From: Dr_mohamed_hassan_104
• يا جماعة فى منـح تعليميـة مجانية فى مجال برمجة الكمبيوتر
  • From: Dr_mohamed_hassan_104
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space
  • From: snapdragon31
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Why relativists are trolls.
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: New Light On The Speed of Light
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: New Light On The Speed of Light
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: New Light On The Speed of Light
  • From: xray4abc
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space
  • From: Sue...
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Is it Possible For A Particle To Stay Completely Still in Space-Time?
  • From: Mark Martin
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• gravity experiments, accuracy and what they test
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Why relativists are trolls.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: errata corrige
  • From: Bilge
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Hauke Reddmann
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: GSS
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: Bilge
• Re: "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• "Overview of the Einsteinhoax Website"
  • From: Elgnis
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space
  • From: Sue...
• Gravity of Newton, relativity, and falling space
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: CHRIST: THE ARRIVAL
  • From: George Hammond
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: GSS
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: GSS
• Re: New Light On The Speed of Light
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: New Light On The Speed of Light
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: New Light On The Speed of Light
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• Re: New Light On The Speed of Light
  • From: Autymn D. C.
• mysterious motion, em or outgasing
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Gerald L. O'Barr
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Interest in Physics
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: What is the correct explanation for the Null result of MM Exper...
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Sir Karl Popper on Einstein's Block Universe
  • From: G=EMC^2 Glazier
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: FrediFizzx
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Simple explanation of the Sagnac effect.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Simple explanation of the Sagnac effect.
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Eric Gisse
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: bsr3997@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Challenge to Tom Roberts
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: David Thomson
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Sepp
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Sepp
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Sepp
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Sepp
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Androcles
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Sepp
• Re: Simple explanation of the Sagnac effect.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Roe
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Simple explanation of the Sagnac effect.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: stephen
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: 'gravitons'
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: mluttgens
• "The Nature of Mass"
  • From: Elgnis
• 'gravitons'
  • From: Thomas Heger
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: GSS
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: There Is a Horror in Einstein's Cult
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: John Parker's anticonceptions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: cnn is asking "are we trusting the scientists too much?"
  • From: zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Simple explanation of the Sagnac effect.
  • From: Androcles
• "Hollywood Physics"
  • From: tuvok
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Simple explanation of the Sagnac effect.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Aetherist
• Falling Objects, How They Fall
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: johnreed take 1C --- 2005
  • From: Joe Fischer
• John Parker's anticonceptions
  • From: shuba
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Twin Paradox Question
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Twin Paradox Question
  • From: ESKI
• Re: Twin Paradox Question
  • From: ESKI
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: ESKI
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Jim Black
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: harry
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: harry
• Re: holographic principle and relitivity
  • From: Joe Fischer
• cnn is asking "are we trusting the scientists too much?"
  • From: argon
• Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications
  • From: argon
• Re: Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: Nick Summers
• hobba is a gay
  • From: argon
• Re: holographic principle and relitivity
  • From: Dolby
• Re: holographic principle and relitivity
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Experimental Detection of Universal Reference Frame
  • From: GSS
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: jpkurhi
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• FTL approach marker
  • From: Sue...
• "Do Virtual Photons Exist?"
  • From: Elgnis
• Merry Christmas
  • From: The_Red_Telephone
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: shuba
• Re: New Light On The Speed of Light
  • From: Androcles
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: shuba
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Cubic Complex Variables / Applications
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: New Light On The Speed of Light
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: New Light On The Speed of Light
  • From: Symmetry Observer
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: On the Theory and Physics of the Aether
  • From: shuba
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• SR ether moving clocks
  • From: beda pietanza
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: Sue...
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: significant zero
• Re: Stripping away the bull shit
  • From: significant zero
• Re: Michelson and Morley
  • From: John Kennaugh
• Re: johnreed take 1C --- 2005
  • From: PD
• Re: johnreed take 1C --- 2005
  • From: Joe Fischer
• johnreed take 1C --- 2005
  • From: randamajor
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Simple explanation of the Sagnac effect.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: PD
• Re: Special Relativity as Special Case of perceptual Universes
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: Mahmoud In My Dinner Jacket
• Re: "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: PD
• Re: Greetings, NUTS
  • From: PD
• Re: Only a Fool
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Only a Fool
  • From: glucose
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Only a Fool
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Orbiting planet
  • From: jaska
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: surrealistic-dream
• Re: Only a Fool
  • From: glucose
• Greetings, NUTS
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: Einsteinians Test Einstein about E=mc2
  • From: Joe Fischer
• "Evidence of the Existence of the Aether"
  • From: Egap
• Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: Simple explanation of the Sagnac effect.
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Androcles
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: N:dlzc D:aol T:com \(dlzc\)
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Hauke Reddmann
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: PD
• Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: mluttgens
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Schrodinger Aether vs Michelson-Morley
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Relativistic contraction of a moving rod.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Ilja Schmelzer
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple explanation of the Sagnac effect.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: Androcles
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR
  • From: The Ghost In The Machine
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Tom Roberts
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bill Hobba
• Re: if gravity were a field
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Aetherist
• Re: Relativistic contraction of a moving rod.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: if gravity were a field
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: if gravity were a field
  • From: Henry Haapalainen
• Re: Simple explanation of the Sagnac effect.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Koobee Wublee
• Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
  • From: markwh04
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: ESKI
• Only a Fool
  • From: Joe Fischer
• Re: holographic principle and relitivity
  • From: PD
• holographic principle and relitivity
  • From: penguinista
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Bilge
• Re: Simple explanation of the Sagnac effect.
  • From: Androcles
• Re: Simple explanation of the Sagnac effect.
  • From: Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: Ping jem
  • From: AllYou!
• Simple explanation of the Sagnac effect.
  • From: Len Gaasenbeek
• Re: Hobba's misconceptions
  • From: Harry
• Re: Relativistic contraction of a moving rod.
  • From: Sue...
• Re: relativity problems
  • From: glucose
• Re: relativity problems
  • From: glucose
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: PD
• Re: if gravity were a field
  • From: glucose
• Re: They verified a wrong theory
  • From: Josef Matz
• Re: if gravity were a field
  • From: glucose
• Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity problems
  • From: PD
• Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR
  • From: PD
• Re: relativity problems
  • From: glucose
• Re: relativity problems
  • From: glucose
• Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: GPS corrections
  • From: Randy Poe
• Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: On the "contraction" of a rod in SR
  • From: kenseto@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Simple explanation of the Sagnac effect.