Re: anybody wants to read something in german?



>
> Sorry, but for the whole scale from galaxies to the smallest elementary
> particles we need only two theories - GR and QM. Thus, each of these
> theories already covers a sufficiently large range.
>
> Ilja
>
(sorry for my spelling mistakes)

Thats what I 'm thinking.
The two theories are like both sides of the same medal. QM for quantums and
GR for the big things.
I din't want to introduce a new theory. I wanted to find a way to understand
the differences, and how to cut their range of universality.

thomas heger


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: MOND
    ... smaller scale objects. ... A recent review of data for 60 galaxies (in ... Dark matter may address the general trends but it cannot ... DM fails to pass all galactic test at once: ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Increase in granularity
    ... today I'm asked what the phrase "increase in granularity" means. ... quality of being composed of relatively large particles, ... It's the same problem I have when someone refers to a "larger scale map"...I ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: Everything is made up of atoms, correct ?
    ... is nothing but tiny miniscule particles vibrating really really fast, ... what if we were able to actually see thigns at this scale? ... Would we see nothing but atoms all around us? ... Because special equipment are ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Where is M13? - version 1.2
    ... When I use the slider to change the scale, ... go back to the single connector. ... Were you showing all the galaxies at once by any chance? ... one and back again as you zoom the opposite direction. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Implicit surface from particles
    ... I'm trying to build an implicit surface from particles in a 3d package ... but I have a bit of trouble with a scale problem... ...
    (comp.graphics.visualization)