Re: A little challenge for relativists.

From: "Androcles" <Androcles@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 01 Dec 2005 22:54:09 GMT

"Harry" <harald.vanlintel@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:438f0207$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Lorentz invariance is based on Poincare's PoR; nothing else to "discover".
>
> Harald

Poincare's PoR! ROFLMAO!!!
Androcles

.

References:
- Re: A little challenge for relativists.
  - From: Harry

Prev by Date: Re: A little challenge for relativists.
Next by Date: Re: A little challenge for relativists.
Previous by thread: Re: A little challenge for relativists.
Next by thread: Re: A little challenge for relativists.
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: why lorentz transformation?
... ROFLMAO! ... I don't see sine or cosine mentioned anywhere! ... Androcles. ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.physics.relativity)
Re: Androcles and Henris Theory of Diffraction Grating Behavior
... > | Androcles wrote: ... > |> ROFLMAO! ... Jerry ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.physics.relativity)
Re: Einsteins stationary clock
... "Androcles" wrote: ... >> That's a denial of the PoR, which you were so keen to promote. ... Acceleration is an effect, not a cause. ...
(sci.physics.relativity)
Re: Did the Mullen miss this weeks TOTP then?
... > Good luck! ... ROFLMAO! ... Ian ... Prev by Date: ...
(uk.media.tv.misc)
Re: Undefined function question...
... | If I want to find the maximum domain and range of the function, ... Androcles ... Prev by Date: ...
(sci.math)