Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: "David Thomson" <google@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 6 Dec 2005 12:15:13 -0800
Hi Eric,
Since we are discussing how my theory predicts the gravitational
behavior of matter, we must also use my definitions of matter.
Physical matter is electrons and protons, antimatter is positrons and
antiprotons. Both matter and antimatter are visible matter. Neutrinos
are dark matter, which is why they don't interact directly with
electrons and protons and can only interact with neutrons (neutrons are
composite particles). Neutrons are a bound proton and electron. The
neutrino is captured dark matter that resides in the space between the
proton and electron. Neutrinos can knock other neutrinos out of
neutrons, thus initiating beta decay, but neutrinos have no effect on
matter and antimatter.
So neutrino and antineutrino observations will tell us nothing about
the gravitational behavior between matter and antimatter. We need to
directly measure the behavior of electrons and protons acting on
positrons and antiprotons.
This isn't as difficult as it may sound. There are identified positron
clouds in space. If we can track the movement of the positron clouds
with respect to stars made of known matter or antimatter, then we could
tell whether there is a gravitational attraction or repulsion.
My theory also leaves open the possibility that entire stars or even
galaxies may be made from antimatter. These stars could exist in our
own neighborhood and they would look completely normal to us, because
the photon is its own antiparticle. Only by observing gravitational
effects can we determine for certain whether a star is made from matter
or antimatter (without physically contacting it).
Dave
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: PD
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- References:
- Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Bilge
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Vollane
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- From: Eric Gisse
- Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- Prev by Date: Re: E = mc^2
- Next by Date: Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- Previous by thread: Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- Next by thread: Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|