Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists

>> Since we are discussing how my theory predicts the gravitational
>> behavior of matter, we must also use my definitions of matter.

> Provided your "definitions" are consistent with experiment.

My definitions are consistent with experiment, yes.

>> Physical matter is electrons and protons, antimatter is positrons and
>> antiprotons. Both matter and antimatter are visible matter. Neutrinos
>> are dark matter, ...The neutrino is captured dark matter that resides in
>> the space between the proton and electron.

> No, they aren't. They don't have enough mass to account for the dark
> matter inferred.

I didn't say neutrinos were all of dark matter. I said neutrinos are
made *from* dark matter.

>> which is why they don't interact directly with
>> electrons and protons

> Yes, they do.

No, they don't. Neutrinos have no charge and their angular momentum
does not share the same fabric of space-time as electrons and protons.
Neutrinos exist in between the quanta of space-time, which is why they
can pass easily through massive bodies such as the Sun and Earth.

>> (neutrons are composite particles).

> Yes, so are protons.

No, protons are not composite particles. Protons and electrons are
quantum matter. That is why protons and electrons do not have a half
life. Yes, it is true that modern science wished protons have a half
life, then there would be substantiation for the unfounded theory that
protons and neutrons are two manifestations of a nucleon particle. As
for protons being destroyed and the debris flying off for 10^-12
seconds, so what. All matter can be destroyed (so much for the
absolute conservation laws). We know matter can be destroyed because
we see it happen in particle colliders. But that doesn't mean protons
are made up tiny particles that last only 10^-12 seconds. If a glass
vase is shattered, does that mean somewhere in the Universe someone is
making glass vases out of glass shards?

>> The neutrino is captured dark matter that resides in the space between the
>> proton and electron.

> No, it isn't.

It most certainly is. Observation shows it, and I can quantify it.

> Experiments are constructed all the time that rely on the
> interactions of neutrinos with matter.

At the quantum level you need to be more specific. There is no such
quantified thing as "matter." Matter is a generic term. The matter
that neutrinos interact with are specifically neutrons. Neutrinos do
not share the same space-time as electrons and protons. Neutrinos
exist outside of the quantum fabric of space-time, which is why they
can pass so easily through massive bodies such as the Sun and Earth.

>> This isn't as difficult as it may sound. There are identified positron
>> clouds in space.

> No, there aren't.

Yes, there are:
http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/211.web.stuff/waschke/page8.html

>> My theory also leaves open the possibility that entire stars or even
>> galaxies may be made from antimatter.

> So does conventional theory.

Tell that to Eric Gisse. He seems not to know that. *snicker*

> Wow, Dave, you sure launched into an area where you know next to
> nothing.

Judging from the number of errors you made, I know more than you think
I do. Besides, don't tell me I don't know what my own theory predicts,
unless you can quantify or qualify your statements.

Dave

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Sci Am proposes SR wrong and Aether exists
    ... We don't observe protons to be composite particles. ... I did not say that neutrinos do not interact with ... I specifically say they do interact with matter. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Dayton Millers Data have no Real Signal
    ... > Protons are composite particles,... ... > Neutrions are not dark matter. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Electrons in the universe
    ... We have numbers for mass ... density for matter, and matter contains electrons ... compared to the protons and neutrons in matter. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Composition of photons
    ... occupies space. ... And even what you call elementary particles are composed of matter such ... Electrons, protons and other objects at or below the atomic scale, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Will the LHC Supernova?
    ... At present the standard model doesn't work. ... The way in which they are obtaining these so called protons. ... How anything at all gets done is it doesn't matter what you believe, ... But if you try to formulate some sort of cohesive physics well good ...
    (sci.physics)