Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation


"Joe Fischer" <efischer@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:vjjnp1h6142ghp2822697i0tf2odv8l83s@xxxxxxxxxx
> On Sun, "Bill Hobba" <rubbish@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>"Joe Fischer" wrote:
>>> I suspect most scientists have not considered a model
>>> where the unit intervals constantly change with the passage
>>> of time.
>>
>>They most certainly have - research the origin of gauge theory. In
>>particular have a look at the contributions of Weyl whose original gauge
>>theory allowed for precisely that - amongst other things.
>
> That has nothing to do with the type of physics
> the Divergent Matter model requires, the general class
> of gauge theories are math theories.

Not this rubbish again. Any theory that makes predictions in accord with
observation is a valid theory regardless of if it is expressed in the
language of math or not.

>
> Any physicist interested in gravity would do well to
> work out the theory before starting any math.
>

All modern theories use mathematical formalism. Your obvious inability to
grasp such does not change the facts.

>
> I am going on assumption that the math for the
> physics of the Divergent Matter model does not exist yet,
> but surely it will some day.
>
> But as long as physicists say the reference frames
> are falling,

Since that is not what physicists say all you are doing, as usual, is
exposing your ignorance.

Bill

> the apple falls and and the readings of an
> accelerometer on the surface of the Earth are wrong,
> then there will be no advances in gravity theory.
>
> But the dollar value of the prizes for gravity essays
> is going way up, according to this link it is now $3500.
>
> http://www.gravityresearchfoundation.org
>
> Joe Fischer
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: the basis of relativity
    ... >> The entire standard model follows from gauge invariance. ... ``observe'' the color degrees of freedom as directly as most anything ... Nuclear isospin is very commony used in nuclear physics ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity.
    ... I never said that gauge invariance is irrelevant. ... You may be right that unitary transformation does not change physics if ... observables, Hamiltonian, wave functions. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: the basis of relativity
    ... If one can develop a theory which isn't gauge ... >>>correct in that we needn't do physics. ... I assert that the standard model and various ... >which we may directly observe hadrons and leptons. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity.
    ... > of electromagnetism, there's no point in discussing your theory. ... >>understand everything in physics. ... > bunch of physicists at a seminar and try to argue that gauge invariance is ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Download a new book on quantum mechanics and relativity.
    ... > of electromagnetism, there's no point in discussing your theory. ... >>understand everything in physics. ... > bunch of physicists at a seminar and try to argue that gauge invariance is ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)