Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal

Joe Fischer wrote:
> On 9 Dec 2005 21:45:15 -0800, demeo@xxxxxxxx wrote:
> I really believe that before any time is wasted looking
> at data, a new specification of just what this ether is
> supposed to be and just what it is supposed to do.
> I haven't seen a single post that proffers any
> attribbutes that this wonderful ether is supposed to
> have. And the reason is, there can't be any attributes
> that enable long range gravity.

I have posted links to my paper that quantifies the structure of the
Aether, shows its relationship to matter, and unifies all the forces
(including gravity).
http://www.16pi2.com/files/NewFoundationPhysics.pdf

It would be fine to point out the errors in this paper (not mere
opinions), but it is demeaning to ignore it. You talk about the many
scientists who are forced to accept Relativity theories today or face
professional censure, but what about those scientists who continually
find evidence of the Aether's existence and continually expouse its
many uses in physics?

I have completely quantified the Aether as a fabric of quantum rotating
magnetic fields, which fully explains exactly what electric and
magnetic fields are. The theory further demonstrates that strong
charge, which mediates the strong force, is orthogonal to mass. Thus
the gravitational force is orthogonal to the strong force, which is why
Einstein was able to develop GR based upon gravity, when it should have
been based upon charge.

In Einstein's GR, the tensors are space-time curvature (whatever that
is) and mass/energy (whatever that is). In the Aether Physics Model
the tensors are the electrostatic charge of the Aether (electrostatic
charge is well-known) and the electromagnetic charge of matter (fully
quantified within the theory and understandable).

One of the most pressing problems for Einstein was finding the Unified
Force Theory, which he thought would be an important discovery for
physics. The Aether Physics Model I present has a mathematically
correct, very simple Unified Force Theory, complete with a full set of
force laws for each force. Modern physics cannot do this, but an
Aether theory can. This is significant.

I'm glad that Tom Roberts has gotten hold of the data. He seems
qualified to analyze it from a modern perspective. My feeling is that
all the old science needs to be continually proven with each new
student and subjected continually to rigorous critical analysis. I
look forward to his paper and being able to review his work in detail.
I would really like to understand why he sees the data as absolute
proof that Miller had a systematic error, while Maurice Allais was
absolutely certain there could not have been a systematic error.
Perhaps between the two perspectives we'll get a deeper understanding
of the true message of Miller's data.

I'm also glad to see James Demeo posting here. I have several of his
books and I have read his work over the past couple years. He has some
interesting perspectives that might help understand the data.

As for the Aether and its perfect inelasticity, that only applies to
its surface area. The actual, individual Aether units are capable of
changing shape without changing surface area. The Aether units have a
toroidal type of geometry so that the small radius can shrink while the
large radius grows, thus allowing a certain amount of "springiness,"
which manifests as the inseparable functions of permeability and
permittivity. String theory also predicts this type of behavior with
regard to strings. Also, the Aether units are capable of folding over
on to each other, which is what causes the phenomenon of pairing in
quantum and atomic bindings. Further, each quantum unit of Aether is a
rotating magnetic field and is capable of moving against adjacent
Aether units like perfect ball bearings (which is the reason objects
move so easily through space-time). So although the Aether is
perfectly inelastic with regard to its surface area, it is quite
flexible and moveable, like a perfect fluid and gas. In this way,
Aether acts as a perfect solid, fluid, and gas, simultaneously.

To address your concerns, the Aether is fully quantifiable and an
extremely useful tool for modern physics.

Dave

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
    ... for a single point charge moving inertially, ... in that in classic electrodynamics as per Maxwell that force was the ... result of stress in the aether, (stress in the aether = electrostatic ... increasing complexity of modern physics as showing that to be the case. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Dayton Millers Data have no Real Signal
    ... studied in physics and chemistry. ... >>>I have completely quantified the Aether as a fabric of quantum rotating ... The orthogonality of charge and mass works in the same way. ... >> maybe gravity would result. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Dayton Millers Data have no Real Signal
    ... has uses in physics. ... >>I have completely quantified the Aether as a fabric of quantum rotating ... The orthogonality of charge and mass works in the same way. ... Not only does it unify the forces, quantifies matter, quantifies ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Physical interpretation in physics.
    ... A charge does not move because an equation says ... The starting point is that not only was it considered as being capable of further understanding but the aether, which was the key part to that understanding, was found to be a useful concept in other respects and is the basis of Maxwell's electrodynamics. ... distance force on a charge the existence of an aether is one ... If you are suggesting that you can assume that the action at a distance force between charges can be considered as fundamental and that can be assumed in isolation without it affecting anything else in physics then I cannot agree. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Magnetism is a false or fictatious force.
    ... Perhaps we should start with charge. ... result of stress in the aether, (stress in the aether = electrostatic ... physics decided to keep those properties of the aether it ... understanding of what an 'electrostatic field' *is* changed. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)