Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation


>>
>>I don't know, what Your theory is about, but I like what You have written.
>
> The Divergent Matter model is really crazy and bizarre,
> but it is the only one that I know of that doesn't require a
> medium or particles or fields.
>
> It is about matter expanding, mostly with just velocity,
> but a little bit of acceleration.

Why should matter expand?
It would violate the law of conservation of energy. Gravitation pushes
matter together as far as I know.
Expansation requires energy and where should that come from?

>>Its necessary to kill the holy cows of physics: one are 'fields' (the
>>other
>>is 'matter')
>
> Well, I have to stick with matter, it is the thing we are
> able to measure and work with.
> There are fields, but for gravity, just the math is treated
> as a field.

What I ment was: to explain something basic like 'matter', we can use only
principles more basic.

>>I don't think, that anything in the world will do you the favor of
>>following
>>any kind of formula if not forced by heavy constraints.
>
> I don't think one formula will work with the Divergent
> Matter model, Newtonian gravity uses all the other aspects
> of Newtonian mechanics in problems.
> But the model isn't important, except to have something
> to study, some pattern to follow to see where it leads.
>
>>There are only a few
>>choices: the conservation laws, topology of space, quantum effects,
>>probability effects, that come from big numbers.
>
> The model does not assign attributes to space, but
> considers the distance between objects in empty space
> as just what the meter stick measures.

I like the idea of assigning attributes (properties) to space and to
derivate 'length' from time.

>>The field-theorists are much to proud about their knowledge of mathcad,
>>that they forget to deliver an answer to the question: what is a field.
>>thomas heger
>
> I think they realize it is just a way to do the math,
> gravity is very mysterious.

Gravity is a very obvious phaenomenon, since we all are dragged down by a
strong force.
I would like to have a modell for gravity containing only space and energy
as entities in it.

>I think there are enough
> physicists it doesn't make sense to ignore any model,
> schools perhaps should assign at least a couple of
> graduate students to work on any model that is ever
> proposed.
> Having all of them working on the same one or
> two models doesn't make sense.
> And letting them all chose the model they want
> to work on will allow them to chose the one they think
> may be the right one, just to avoid the wrong ones.

Certainly, but at the end the audience wants to know, what they should
believe.

> I think the best models are ones which produce
> Einstein's Principle of Equivalence results as a natural
> result of physical processes, rather than from principles
> or postulates.
>
> Electromagnetism works good at short range, but
> at long range, all it can do is produce heat or destructive
> rays.

Its really a tough challenge, to proove quantum-physics is wrong in any
case, since they are doing a very good job and they are awfully successful.

> So until and unless some other type of "field" is
> found, a process involving matter at close range seems
> to have enough merit to be studied in depth.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Joe Fischer
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Photon Mass, Measuring Distance, and Mercurys orbit
    ... there are also quarks and lepton making up matter. ... there is no contradication between my claims and ... Gravity and Electromagnetism are both long range and it is expected ... The actual physics is truly fascinating. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Fundamental Question about GR
    ... One of fundamental observations in physics is inertia. ... Space tells matter how to move" --J.A.Wheelerhttp://en.allexperts.com/e/j/jo/john_archibald_wheeler.htm ... gravity and inertia are molecular interactions. ... their neighbours to  conduct electromagnetism. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Non-homogenous theories of space and time
    ... >>questions in current physics a layer deeper than they need ... Doesn't matter. ... Theorem") are _observed_ at this "level of reality", ... > theory of gravity that allows the graviton to move faster than c. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Zero Geodesic Deviation
    ... we see as changes in motion due to what we call gravity. ... >It would violate the law of conservation of energy. ... matter expanding be a problem? ... rather than from principles ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Dark matter
    ... to put it another way, if there is no dark matter, how different ... physics (as far as gravity is concerned) are correct. ... matter in any obvious way except through gravity, ...
    (talk.origins)