Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: stephen@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 14:22:52 +0000 (UTC)
David Thomson <google@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Eric Gisse wrote:
>>
>> Show us what the rejection letter said, exactly. I don't believe it was
>> just for that reason. You have nobody to keep your ego in check, as I
>> have said before.
> The article submitted was:
> http://www.16pi2.com/files/NewFoundationPhysics.pdf
> 1 September 2005
> Dear Dr Thomson
> TITLE: A new foundation of physics
> AUTHORS: Dr David W Thomson et al
> Thank you for your submission to New Journal of Physics. However, we do
> not publish this type of article in any of our journals and so we are
> unable to consider your article further.
> Thank you for considering New Journal of Physics.
> Yours sincerely
And where does this letter say that your paper "was rejected solely
on the basis that it quantifies the Aether"?
Stephen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- References:
- Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Eric Gisse
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: David Thomson
- Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- Prev by Date: Re: Schrodinger Aether vs Michelson-Morley
- Next by Date: Re: Magnetic Field of a Finite Wire
- Previous by thread: Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- Next by thread: Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|