Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Joe Fischer <efischer@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 23:01:41 -0500
On Wed, "Harry" <harald.vanlintel@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>"Joe Fischer" wrote:
>> Gravity was still considered to be a force, only
>> Einstein wanted it it be a local force, as a part of a
>> unified field, which I assume must have meant just
>> gravity-electromagnetic field.
>
>Are you sure? To me it makes more sense to assume that the field doesn't
>directly exerce a force -- thus to adapt EM to gravity, instead of the other
>way round.
Assuming a field that does not exert a force does
nothing except remove a hypothetical and wrong mechanism.
It takes a lack of both imagination and reasoning logic
to not see that the Principle of Equivalence of surface
gravity and acceleration is not an important clue to nature.
>> And all I am looking for is a mechanism for gravity,
>> a mechanical one.
>
>Why not "the ether"/space? ;-)
>Harald
I am just crazy, I am not stupid.
That is what the nut in the yard at the crazy house
said when the guy that had a wheel fall off and asked,
"how come you are in there if you are smart enough to
tell me to take one lug nut from each of the other wheels?".
Joe Fischer
.
- References:
- Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: demeo
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Tom Roberts
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: demeo
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: David Thomson
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Joe Fischer
- Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- From: Harry
- Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- Prev by Date: Re: A little challenge for relativists.
- Next by Date: Re: if gravity were a field
- Previous by thread: Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- Next by thread: Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|