Re: Dayton Miller's Data have no Real Signal

On 15 Dec "David Thomson" wrote:

>Joe Fischer wrote:
>> I doubt if I will be able to understand the math.
>
>This is becoming apparent, even without your honest admission.

There are different kinds of math and each can be
applied to different uses. If I ever find a use, the math
is easy to learn because it never changes.

>> >> The rest are BS, including me.
>> >
>> >Many of my conversations on these newsgroups have been with nuclear and
>> >lab engineers. I don't doubt that you may only have a BS,
>>
>> I did not say I have a BS, and I do not have a BS,
>> I said I am BS.
>
>LOL. That sounds like when I told someone on these newsgroups that I
>have the kind of degree where I could put GED after my name they
>thought I had a General Engineering Degree.

My GED is bigger than your GED.

>> Some very talented people have said my ideas are insane.
>
>"Crackpot" is the normal term used for someone outside the box.

Whatever, as long as they spell the name right.

>> I had a very good friend that was a Pentagon Colonel,
>> and on a visit to me he said "there is no way a ship or aircraft
>> can't be seen on radar".
>> I was too sick to drive at that time, and he took me
>> to my post office box where I picked up the D2 document
>> of allowance for my patent which withheld issue until the
>> secrecy order was removed.
>> Lockheed did not get allowance on their F-117 "vehicle"
>> patent until 6 years later.
>
>How did you get a patent without having to work simple algebra
>somewhere along the line?

A patent is a disclosure of a physical construction
or a method, published with a letter giving right to sue
for a specified period of time those who use it without
permission. Why would math be needed for drawings
and a specification? In fact, dimensions are not even
used, so it may be a rare patent that needs math.

I think math is overrated by some people who
do not understand it.

>What did you do, stumble across something by
>accident and write a story about it?

Not hardly, I applied for a patent on a utility airfoil,
and then tried to think of a good use for it.

I had considerable interest in telescopes and was
offering a booklet and materials for sale to make molds
for "Large Plane Segmented SolarEnergy Concentrating
Mirrors".
I used my knowledge of optics, and applied it to
radar and active infra-red.

>My father is a retired high ranking military official. I respect your
>reasons for not talking further about your patent.

I have no reason not to talk about it, in fact I should
be active trying to promote the sale of it. I am not restricted
in any way from talking about it, I have never been privy to
any government project, and they have never disclosed
anything to me, they just prevented me from marketing
my invention until 1995.

Anybody can read it, it is "Electronic Avoidance
Configurations". "Fischer".
I applied for it in December 1978, and Lockheed
applied in Feb. 1979, but my application was missing
documents required by law, so it was given a Sept 1979
filing date.
I doubt if Lockheed would have been allowed by
the Air Force to apply for a patent, but they knew I had
filed an incomplete application, and had Lockheed
prepare the application and hand carried it to the patent
office and had two supervisory attorneys stamp it
received but didn't allow them to read it, but just briefed
them on the subject matter.

Then Air Force took the application and put it
in their safe in their section of the patent office, and
it stayed there and not seen until 1993 by anyone.

But applications under secrecy order are not given
the same privileges as others.
My application contains technology that can be
applied to anything, the lockheed patent just discloses
a particular airplane design.

>> >But in the end, what does a degree mean? It's the math and the data
>> >that determines the science, not the credentials of the person
>> >presenting it.
>>
>> A BS means the rudimentary knowledge has been
>> demonstrated, but there is a wide range of talent that
>> will be needed to use that knowledge.
>
>The rudimentary knowledge gained from a degree will be peer reviewed
>knowledge, and in most cases, will be the best knowledge available for
>that topic. But it is not a guarantee that the knowledge is correct
>and not subject to refinement or replacement.

I don't know of any peer reviewed knowledge required
for a BS, what is needed is the number of semester credits
with acceptable grades.

Joe Fischer

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Suggest any topic..
    ... Math consists of what we've learned so far. ... the Patent records issued by the United States Patent and Trademark ... his compression is based ... discussion of compression that *does* take place within the known laws ...
    (comp.compression)
  • Re: Suggest any topic..
    ... Math consists of what we've learned so far. ...  If there are materials missing from the patent, ... As I understand Adam Clark inventing from talks I had with people who ... Adam Clark sworn and signed a paper with this patent issue and when I ...
    (comp.compression)
  • Re: Suggest any topic..
    ... Math consists of what we've learned so far. ...  If there are materials missing from the patent, ... As I understand Adam Clark inventing from talks I had with people who ... Adam Clark sworn and signed a paper with this patent issue and when I ...
    (comp.compression)
  • Re: NSA chooses ECC
    ... >> compression is trivial math but the idea of using the math to save bits is ... If this is then 'patented' you are for ever stuck in software development, ... impossible to do a patent search for every line of code you write..... ... OK, I signed that thing against software patents, I think software patents ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Largest prime ever just discovered
    ... > Can I sell it? ... Can I patent it? ... Math _is_ for profit! ... your number and then submit this sequence to the OEIS. ...
    (sci.math)