hierarchy of phaenomena
- From: "Thomas Heger" <hballo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Dec 2005 08:44:36 +0100
Hallo NG
as naive laymen in my approach to physics, I want to bring the entities of
relativity into a logical order.
I'm programming (my profession) and there are a few usefull principles, like
object-oriented programming, that I want to use in analogy in physics.
What programmers horrifies is: circular dependencies, (cause that would
crash any software).
I'm thinking, that in modelling in physics you find a lot of
circular-dependencies.
Now I want to ask the cracks around, if my proposal for the order of the
most basic entities of the model of relativity is usefull or not:
1) space
2) time
3) constance of c
4) observal space ('the universe')
5) lenght
6) Energy
7) fields
8) matter
The rule is, that a modell can use only entities of a more basic model (with
a lower number).
After number 8) the tree can branch.
For every step, there is a certain reason:
The first one has no lower number, but I hope, that many would agree, that
'space' is basic and obvious enough to claim that as an axiom.
The reason for having the order : time -> constance of c -> observal
space -> lenght is:
if c is a constant, you can say in a Minkowski space: speed of propagation
of an object v is c and c=v=ds/dt -> ds=c*dt.
Energy I regard as an objekt and more basic than fields, otherwise I could
not explain fields.
A field is the mathematical discription of how a for example force
distributes in space.
A force is:
F=m*a
assuming E=m*c² and c=constant are true, then its possible to say:
a=ds/dt²
m=E/c²
ds=dt*c
F=(E/c²) * (ds/dt²)
F=(E/c²) * (dt*c/dt²)
F=E/(c*dt)
There you have got only E and dt based on a time-dimension and c, which is a
constant. (this is the reason to give time a lower number than lenght and E
a lower number than fields.)
To explain matter, you have now entities 1) - 7), but not matter iself.
thomas heger
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena
- From: Bill Hobba
- Re: hierarchy of phaenomena
- Prev by Date: Re: "A Snapshot of a Photon"
- Next by Date: Re: New Light On The Speed of Light
- Previous by thread: Re: TO: Barbara Schwarz- GOD & SCIENTOLOGY
- Next by thread: Re: hierarchy of phaenomena
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
